Connolly secured his position on the pivotal Oversight Committee after leaders in the House Democratic caucus—most notably former Speaker Nancy Pelosi—backed Connolly’s bid over Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez.

While other Democratic leaders have been fumbling for a response to Trump, the administration has been in a public feud with Ocasio-Cortez. Tom Homan, Trump’s handpicked immigration czar, has even called on the Department of Justice to investigate the congresswoman after she advised migrant communities of their constitutional rights.

In contrast to Connolly’s pro-compliance message, Ocasio-Cortez recently wrote, “America is not for sale. We have an obligation to resist kings. We outnumber them. And they can be overwhelmed.”

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If nothing else, this whole situation is a very revealing about which Democrat politicians have proverbial balls, which ones have their balls in the clamp (probably for doing embarrassing stuff), and which ones have no proverbial balls at all.

    So far only AOC, Sanders, Pritzker, and a handful of others are showing they have the guts to stand up on the bullshit the administration is pulling.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      So far only AOC, Sanders, Pritzker, and a handful of others are showing they have the guts to stand up on the bullshit the administration is pulling.

      I really want to include the new DNC chair in that list.

      “We’re calling it the ‘Organize Everywhere’ tour,” Martin told ABC13. “It’s a simple premise that if we’re going to win throughout this country and get back into power, we have to organize everywhere. We’re visiting red states, purple states, and blue states on this tour. And Texas really is the future of the Democratic Party. This is such a critical battleground state as we move forward in the 2026 elections – of course, the 28 election cycle and beyond.”

      And

      “We have to earn their trust back, and part of that is not just showing up a few months before the election and asking them for their vote,” Martin said. “We have to get back to organizing year-round where we’re building trust with communities around shared values.”

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/abc13-has-1-on-1-with-new-democratic-national-committee-chair-ken-martin/ar-AA1zI1f4

      Like, he’s had the chair a month, and he’s going out and doing local station news interviews already.

      For the past 30 years every other chair would have been grifting huge dollar donors in exchange for more conservative policy positions right now.

      • deadtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not trying to be an asshole but if you expect anything will materially change you shouldn’t be surprised when the DNC rug pulls you again.

        I really want to include the new DNC chair in that list.

        I strongly disagree.

        “There are a lot of good billionaires out there that have been with Democrats, who share our values, and we will take their money. But we’re not taking money from those bad billionaires” - New DNC Head Martin

        The DNC is run by corporate democrats which, aside from the hate, racism and bigotry, might well be the on the same team as Republicans when it comes to facilitating the actions of the wealthy in this country. Its why nothing materially changes when Dems run the show. Their wealthy donors are happy with the job they are doing currently, which doesn’t include improving the quality of life for the vast majority of us because it is easier to exploit a populous that is teetering on the edge of ruin. How many of you cant change jobs because you’d lose your insurance? How few Americans have 500 dollars in the bank for a catastrophic emergency? The fact that we have to live in such a precarious position is a feature to the wealthy that allows them to exploit us for their significant personal gains. They don’t see us as people, they see us as a resource to exploit and toss when they are done.

        Did Biden push for Universal healthcare, or even talk about it really? What about pressing for codifying of Roe v. Wade? Or wage theft being, from a dollar perspective, the vast majority of theft that occurs in this country? Marijuana reform? Better to leave that as a carrot to try to get votes as they’ve shown in the last 3 elections… What about taxing the rich as a rebuttal to the constant assault on social services that help the most vulnerable in our society yet account for the smallest fraction of the actual budget? Or upholding the law and holding Trump and his cronies for the January 6th attack on our nation, which should have prevented Trump from running in the first place? The wealthy in this country are seeing their wealth explode from a government that today has enabled them to wholesale embrace corruption by attacking regulatory and oversight bodies… wonder why they didnt want Trump to be held accountable…

        Biden did things in his term to help Americans to an extent, but these Donkeys in the room are glaring examples of areas that Biden had flat out ignored or intentionally neglected us. The reason to me is that the money didn’t support those initiatives… i.e. not in the donors interests.

        Remember that the DNC put Biden there, and if we let them they will happily keep playing the role of controlled opposition as a fulcrum to leverage our nation to the right while giving lip service to the things we care about and enriching themselves with our donations.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Why are so many people stuck on a single comment he made during the DNC chair campaign when he was asked if he’d take donations from billionaires?

          Do you legitimately think he’d have won the chair election by answering no?

          And why did so many people all discover this comment from over a month ago about 48 hours ago?

          I’m legitimately asking because I followed the chair election pretty damn closely, and even at the time it was made it just wasn’t a big deal…

          But most importantly:

          I really want to include the new DNC chair in that list.

          I didn’t say he should be, I said I want to include him.

          He has a long and respectable history at the state level, and I have no reason not to be optimistic that he’ll stay that way…

          Yet.

          So I want him to keep doing the right thing and earn on a spot on that list.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      Obligatory reminder that Sanders is categorically excluded from being a “Democrat with proverbial balls” not because he doesn’t have balls, but because he isn’t a Democrat. I deny the Democratic Party credit for his courage.

    • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not about balls, it’s about loyalty. AOC and the like have loyalty to the country while corporate Dems have loyalty to corporate interests.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      After the Bernie Sanders’ “stop arms sale to Israel vote”, I can confidently say %90 of democrats are just worthless human shits who would have fared just as well being members of the Republic party or United Russia (Putin’s party) or AKP (Erdoğan’s party). As long as they got a seat of some power to glue their sweaty asses to, they will adapt to anything.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      man suggests employees write an email to their new boss as requested, in attempt to keep their current job, immediately becomes the new nazi collaborator

      not at all the extremist take from the new fundamentalists designed to destroy the dems and ultimately help keep trump-like politicians in power

  • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just to state the obvious, you should be bitching at your representatives, state and federal, all the time.

    Yes, that includes me too. And no, I don’t do it either.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    If we are going to lose anyways it’s time to make a third party. Call it the Progressive Party and continue to lose until democrats give up. These people literally only care about lining their pockets.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah that seems to be a popular idea but it never gets anywhere after that.

      My thought was, since the DNC organization exists and anyone can participate, we should y’know - take it over. Basically. Like it was intended.

      So in the first example we’d have to build it from scratch (pros/cons) and in the second example, we’d have to deal with a fully functioning national party (pros/cons).

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        They essentially cancelled the last few primaries. Bernie was gonna win and they cancelled it. Biden wanted to run so they cancelled it. Biden backed out last minute so they cancelled it for Kamala. Shit is so undemocratic it’s crazy.

        • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Bernie was gonna win and they cancelled it? Okay, Imma need to see some articles on that.

          Basically unless you’re talking about Texas or California or heck even PA and Bernie is polling at ~90% and the DNC says “actually we’re cancelling due to rain” I’m going to find there’s no reason to assume Bernie was going to win and they cancelled primaries to prevent him.

          That’s just - Fox News type of narrative. It’s lacking all context and the context it does have is childishly simple and outrageous.

  • SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    And now the party should primary him…too bad the party is a feckless shell of bullshit wrapped around a bunch of greedy little piggies.

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What makes a democrat “top”?

    Like, is he the one who fucks you in the ass? That’s probably it.

    Edit: just to remind everyone; the DNC is a sunk cost. You can keep trying to make them fight back, make them stand up for you, and make them care. At the and of the day they will take your energy, take your money, take your vote and do nothing with it.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      What makes a democrat “top”?

      They have a leadership position, like a committee chair.

      Assuming there was any good faith in there. Which-

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s nice of them to so formally declare themselves enemies of the working class.

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    They say that all that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing (or something similar to that) but it doesn’t hurt to have a few “good” men in power, just go along with it I guess.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    We have to give the people what they want! This is what they voted for.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Voter mandate only seems to pop up as a reasoning when it’s doing what rich people want. When is healthcare reform, VA funding, civil rights bills, or regulations to prevent another economic crash, student debt, or worker’s pay and rights, no amount of voter mandate send to register, we get a 10 year delayed bill that ultimately changes nothing.

    • gdog05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Line 1 of pretty much every government oath out there: Uphold and defend the constitution. First and foremost. You’re not going to find “do any bidding of a newly elected regime” as part of anyone’s official duties. So the “voter mandate” is complete bullshit.