• Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    12 days ago

    Yes, but if Trump refuses to leave office then he will need some serious guards. My understanding of the Constitution is that he becomes a domestic threat at that point and “fighting him” is technically legal … and required by anyone that took an oath to defend the Constitution.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      12 days ago

      Technically he’s barred from office per the 14th amendment.

      Technically is great until it’s ignored.

      • Coyote_sly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        “I’m sure THIS will be the time he faces consequences for blatantly regarding both law and custom! Institutional inertia will protect us now for sure!” say a bunch of ignorant shitlibs for the 1,293,762nd time.

    • dryfter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      He’s already a domestic threat, he doesn’t care about the Constitution or laws

  • StopTouchingYourPhone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    12 days ago

    Yesterday, former President Donald Trump told a group of supporters that they won’t have to vote again if they elect him to the presidency. “You won’t have to do it anymore,” Trump said at the Turning Point Believers’ Summit in Florida. “It’ll be fixed; it’ll be fine; you won’t have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians.” - The Atlantic, July '24

    ‘When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.’ - Maya Angelou

  • tyrant@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    13 days ago

    Twenty-Second Amendment

    Section 1

    No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

    Section 2

    This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.

      • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        12 days ago

        To make this explicit, the law is what Trump and his merry band of miscreants say it is, unless we’re willing to step up as a country and say ‘No it isn’t’ and back those words up with action, if needed. All the words in the Constitution are is ink on a piece of paper, unless we’re willing to stand and fight for them.

    • Leeks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Elected to the office of the President

      If you are looking for a loophole, I think there is an argument to be made that if he is elected to the office of the vice president and the president steps down, that would allow a “3rd term”.

      I would love to be wrong, but I wouldn’t be shocked if that is the play.

      Edit: dhork points out the 12th amendment should block this.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        The 12th amendment states

        But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States

        That seems pretty definitive. The only attack to it I can see (and it’s total bullshit) is that the Originalists on this court may insist on interpreting this amendment based on the state of the Constitution when it was ratified in 1804, and the term limits weren’t passed until 1952.

        • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          The way around that is making him speaker of the house and having both the president and vice president resign. Speaker doesn’t have any real requirements on it.

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            The Constitution leaves what happens if the Presidency and VP are both vacant at the same time up to Congress, and Congress has passed various Presidential Succession Acts, the most recent being 1947. The language in that Act specifically exempts anyone who would otherwise be ineligible from becoming President.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Succession_Act

            And this has been enforced in the past; Cabinet Secretaries who were not natural-born citizens have not been included in the succession list. I remember specifically that when Madeline Albright was Clinton’s Secretary of State, she was not on the list because she was born in Prague.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      But if they are biologically DNA transformed from one gender to another, then they can? Or if trumpfus is born again in the Buddhist sense but in Christianity while doing a ruzzian adult film star? Then he can?

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Just remember, if his new administration has proven anything, it is that the difference between legal and illegal in the American political system is mostly down to everyone being willing to go along with that law. There is very little actual teeth behind a lot of it at the high up federal level.

    So it might be unconstitutional for him to run again, but who is actually going stop him? He has more guns and more sycophants than the court system.

  • GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Conservative don’t like bypassing term limit. Conservative subreddit are already not happy. So yep it’s matter of time some maga nut bag will revolt against him.

  • ZMonster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    The comments seem to be missing the fact that elections are state run, so if he is allowed to run a third time, it won’t be him that broke the law it will be the states and their reps.

    • Ramenator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 days ago

      Remember: The Nazis never officially abolished the democratic Weimar constitution. They just hollowed it out until it was completely ineffectual

  • PurpleSkull@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    12 days ago

    Trump already looks 20 years older 2 months into his second presidency. Look at pictures of him yesterday. How on earth would he even run for a third term, physically I mean? He will be the oldest president EVER by the time his term ends. 2 Years older than Biden when he left. A third term would serve no one but the actual rulers Peter Thiel and Musk behind him…oh.

    • stopdropandprole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I think you’re onto something… Thiel and the billionaires who bankrolled JD Vance knew exactly what they were doing when they made a deal with Trump for the VP seat.

      tinfoil hat time: they will keep Trump for as long as he serves them, then it’s 25th amendment time, and then theyll have their boy JD in power. even if it’s only the remaining term, it’ll be long enough to get the pieces into play for their ancap fantasies of a balkanized USA, with different CEOs over regional corporate fiefdoms.

      • PurpleSkull@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        No tinfoil needed, but keep it because you’re right and the government might microwave you to death now.

        Do you remember how and why JD Vance was picked as Trumps running mate? Despite you know…everything Vance said about Trump before then? Donald barely even knew him. But his son did. Via Thiel. They will 100% get rid of Trump if he ever steps out of line, and he knows it.

      • Bristingr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Trump will be 25th on January 20th 2027, if the Cheeseburger or a Luigi doesn’t get to him first.

    • slickgoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Trump is just a sock puppet for the corporations and ideological doom players behind him. He has no idea what’s going on most of the time.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Why? Because no matter how much the unhinged right, many “centrists”, and some of the leftists and a lot of the corporate media mocked those among the Democrats that said democracy is at risk…it is.

  • mapmyhike@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    I don’t see him surviving this term. He is too old, his mind and body is going. He could be living his best life but instead is destroying everyone eleses.