• P1nkman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    16 days ago

    Who’d see this coming, when the population has no money to spend and the top 0.1% is taking all the money, so there’s nothing to spend? Not the billionaires, that’s for sure. I really cannot wait for the fall when they will realise how much they fucked up. I’m definitely not going to help them, no matter how much money they offer. They did this to themselves, and I’ll be happy when the population starts eating ^the rich^.

    • BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      16 days ago

      It’s actually been this way for a while. The top 10% of American earners do half of all consumer spending. A massive amount of the economy has shifted to reflect this. Businesses are often targeting business to business sales rather than business to customer. Pay to win video games use free players as content for whales to play through. And if you’re selling physical goods, you’re probably either doing it as cheaply as possible, or absolutely gouging the assholes you’re selling to (think ikea vs Kohler’s premium brand, for which a lamp costs 5 figures and the website doesn’t gave prices listed).

        • BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          16 days ago

          Sometimes. The only real difference is earnings. There was the rumor that a saudi prince kept a couple mobile games alive solely based on his own spending for a while. Anecdotally I know of at least one person making six figures who was spending five figures a month on mobile games (and eventually declared bankruptcy) and another spending a grand a month that fit it into his budget. The point remains, games designed to extract thousands from individual players have grown very popular among industry execs because it’s more profitable (and often easier) to squeeze an inordinate amount out of one player than to get $10 out of 100 players. Marketing for that top 1% spender is definitely exploiting addiction, but they’re making it for the ones who will continue to afford it, and thus continue to fund the game

  • Masamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    15 days ago

    So that means Chipotle will lead by example and start paying all their employees a livable wage, right? … Right??

  • TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    16 days ago

    The food is meh. The prices are high. Young people are broke. What do you expect?

  • isyasad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    I love Chipotle. Maybe it’s just the locations near me, but the quality is good and prices are not as high as some others in the thread say; certainly not $20. Maybe $11 or $12, and for a really big meal.

    Unfortunately I stopped eating there when I stopped shopping at Target, when they got rid of their DEI policies in clear capitulation to MAGA. Plenty of places with comparable quality & price that at least try not to do hiring discrimination

    • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 days ago

      Nah, we set up some pillars across the board and place another board on top. Repeat after that one is full. Each level gets more rickety.

  • PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 days ago

    I paid 16$ for a bowl the other day of the new steak. Ya. That was a hard pill to swallow. 16$. I could have gone to Applebee’s for that price, or Chilli’s!

    • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      the best taco place in town (current opinion fluid, we just lost the previous best taqueria and we’re in mourning and search mode) has $2.50 tacos. I have the appetite of a teenager and three satisfy me, plus they’re delicious. i have trouble justifying going elsewhere

    • TehWorld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Uh, the food at both those restaurants is considerably worse. It’s all just microwaved crap as far as I can tell. You CAN get a beer as either tho, which has them generally winning in my book tho.

  • venusaur@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Idk why it got so popular. Plenty of better Mexican options and you don’t have to pay for chips or get e.coli.

  • ebolapie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Well this is interesting to me given that my employer has internally been talking about how Chipotle, the fast casual counter serve restaurant, has been growing faster than our full service pasta restaurant. Which obviously means they’re stealing our market share in our separate segment and we need to move to compete with CMG more.

    Methinks it is time to leave this industry.

    Edit: haha. hahahahahahaha

    A particularly challenged cohort is the 25- to 35-year-old age group," Boatwright said. "This group is facing several headwinds, including unemployment, increased due loan repayment and slower real wage growth.

    ahahahahahahaha they are so out of touch if this is news to them

  • ramsgrl909@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    16 days ago

    The closest Chipotle to me is 45 minutes away and has a < 3 star rating - i think I’ll go literally anywhere else and be content.

  • OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Chipotle has been shit ever since their data breach years ago. Fuck 'em.

    I live twenty minutes from a Qdoba and they have yet to fuck up my order or skimp on toppings.