• voidsignal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    On one hand I’m happy this fuck is dead, and I hope he did suffer.

    On the other hand, we all know he did not commit suicide and got killed by the Pedoresident following the playbook of his BFF putin to try to save his fat orange pedo ass

    • gdog05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      86
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      There’s still the option that it was a faked death. That much wealth and power, if it could be done, that’s who and when it would be done. I’m not giving it much credence without more evidence, but I’ve got no reason to think that it’s not possible given the series of absurd happenings that morning.

      • cattywampas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 days ago

        Not impossible, but I don’t see what advantage there would be to keeping him alive vs just getting rid of him entirely.

      • ronl2k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        There’s still the option that it was a faked death.

        I love watching credible conspiracy theories turn into pure garbage conspiracy theories right before my eyes in one thread.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I’m sure it was possible to swap Epstein out. I just don’t think there was the motivation for it

        No one wants Epstein alive. The rich and powerful want to bury their crimes, normal people want retribution. The only motivator I can imagine would be a deadman switch, but even if Epstein were smuggled out, the rich and powerful would have dismantled any blackmail Epstein had by now and finished the job

        I see no path that still has Epstein alive at this point

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    15 days ago

    In https://lemmy.world/c/Epsteinfiles from 17 days ago:

    https://lemmy.world/post/42921222?scrollToComments=true

    There were two IP’s associated with these comments.

    107.77.223.177

    and

    172.58.139.162

    One IP was responsible for all of the comments regarding medical information (which can be confirmed in part by the autopsy, also available unredacted (mostly) in the files(.

    I tried to follow up on the FBI effort to get the cell data for both of these. As far as I can tell, the rPtND1Si post resolved to a new jersey IP (this is the AT&T customer), and the second resolved to a sprint customer (swam8WIF). If you look up the second IP, it resolved to the Chicago area (the sprint customer). The sprint response to the FBI record request stated that their system used “dynamic IP”. Its not clear to me the FBI followed up on the sprint customer any further. My read was they couldnt get a location from that IP because of sprints internal system.

    See here: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00133349.pdf for the original data.

  • AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    14 days ago

    Elon and his cohorts have been involved in 4chan since it was a cultural phenomenon back in the day. Not because he had some skin in the game, but because it probably felt good to know and disseminate information before the rest of the 4channers knew it. That boy is all about clout before anything else.

    • jve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      clout

      Isn’t 4chan’s main claim to fame that everybody is anonymous?

      • AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        It is! Until you tell everyone that you hang out on /b/. Much like a number of people in his DOGE cabinet that were salivating at the chance to undermine the government without understanding how it functioned. Telling people that you browse /b/ is virtue signaling that you’re mentally deficient.

  • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 days ago

    We have it on record that Epstein and Bannon were frequenting 4chan, so I can only assume it was someone from his circles

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      Its not. By 2019 there were hundreds of thousands of 4chan users. There were two threads of comments the FBI considered credible. One, specifically focused on observable medical conditions and procedures related to the minutes and hour immediately around the time where Epstein’s body is allegedly discovered.

      https://www.justice.gov/age-verify?destination=%2Fepstein%2Ffiles%2FDataSet+9%2FEFTA00129268.pdf

      This leads to this document, “EFTA00091641.pdf”, and the MCC employee “Tova Noel”, and you’ll find this question:

      Search “Verizon” and “Tova Noel”, and you can confirm they were a Verizon customer in document “EFTA00133624.pdf”, from bank records the FBI obtained. These records show the withdrawl dates on which automatic billing occurred.

      Go to document “EFTA00123473.pdf” or “EFTA00125018.pdf” and you get the Verizon subpoena, although, numbers redacted, etc… etc… but its got the specific date window that matters (July 6 2019 until August 13 2019). “EFTA00133182.pdf” gets you the list of all subpoenas, and is redacted poorly enough such that we can infer which people are being targeted. Specifically, Shuliac, Noel, Thomas remain unredacted/ sloppily redacted.

  • jmsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    whenever there is breaking news, I always pop over to 4chan. They have videos, images, witnesses, and statements before any mainstream media.

  • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    It’s hardly surprising that an anonymous social media post could be made quicker than a news story gets approved for publishing?

    • robocall@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Why would a journalist put an anonymous leak on 4chan before publishing their own story? Don’t journalists want their name/company associated with the story?

      • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 days ago

        Sorry, wasn’t suggesting that the journalist did (not that it would harm their story or reputation much for 4chan to see it first) - anyone remotely close to the trail of information between the jail finding out and ABC publishing their story could have posted it - and even if they found out at the same time as the journalist did, they would have easily been first given how much needs to be checked before publishing an article under the name of a news org.