The Department of Homeland Security had directed the state to stop blocking the U.S. Border Patrol’s access to roughly 2½ miles of the U.S.-Mexico border

Texas is refusing to comply with a cease-and-desist letter from the Biden administration over actions by the state that have impeded U.S. Border Patrol agents from accessing part of the border with Mexico.

In a letter to the Department of Homeland Security, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton rejected the Biden administration’s request for the state to “cease and desist” its takeover of Shelby Park, an epicenter of southwest border illegal immigration in Eagle Pass.

“Because the facts and law side with Texas, the State will continue utilizing its constitutional authority to defend her territory, and I will continue defending those lawful efforts in court,” Paxton wrote.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because the facts and law side with Texas

    Lol no they don’t. Paxton knows that. Federal agents always have jurisdiction over the border

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just send in an 18 year old kid with a gun, those Texans will be petrified with fear and won’t even be able to respond. Or does that only work when it’s at a school?

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In a letter to the Department of Homeland Security, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton rejected the Biden administration’s request for the state to “cease and desist”

    WTF? A cease and desist is a demand, not a “request!”

    That’s not even quoting Texas’ fascist AG or anything; that’s the article writers’ own spin. Why are Julia Ainsley and Zoë Richards carrying water for fascists?

  • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What’s the issue? Get a ton of federal agents, march on the border, arrest all obstructing Texas shitheads and beat them down with the book. Make examples out of them.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Read the wiki article on the standoff in Waco, TX, which happened under Clinton. It would be a larger version of that.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Arrest the guy for obstructing federal agencies. Then send another strongly worded letter to everyone else.

      If they still refuse… arrest them too.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is difficult to imagine how enforcing constitutionally-enshrined federal law will spark a civil war.

          Unless you mean these assholes are traitors. At which point it becomes even more important to enforce the rule of law and yeet them out of government.

        • voracitude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You really don’t want that. You might not realise it now, but even if we win, those of us left will gaze at the ashes under which we buried our friends and family, and wish it hadn’t happened.

          • Nudding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah. Humans have driven 70% of all species to extinction. There’s no species worth saving with that kind of track record. Hopefully earth will find harmony thousands or millions of years after we’re gone!

            • voracitude@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If that’s your take, then consider that you’re talking about a civil war and it won’t destroy our species, maybe not even our country, but it’ll damage the planet a lot more than we already have.

              War isn’t good for anyone. Not us, not other animals, not the planet. Not now, not in the long-term. You only wish for it because you haven’t seen it, or the aftermath, and don’t know what it’s like.

              • Nudding@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s just another piece of the polycrisis we’re heading towards, with the main force of instability being the climate tipping points we’ve started and continue to trigger.

                Check out the limits to growth if you’re interested.

                • voracitude@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Man, you’re all over the map. First it’s civil war, now you want to talk about the climate. Finish the topic in front of you, I’m just responding to what you’re saying.

  • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Republicans: We need stronger border protections!

    DHS: Here’s increased BPD funding and facility modernization efforts.

    Republicans: No. Only death.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.eeBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it so hard to ask for a President that Respects the Rule Of Law? If poor people did this they would be in jail! A Politician does this and gets a sternly worded letter!

  • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    everything is now a state by state issue regardless of federal anyway - medical and other insurances such as vehicle policies, what health care you are allowed to receive, wages, how the justice system works, cannabis, food assistance, etcetera

    if the federal government wants it otherwise we should have a federal set of laws we all have to live by no matter the state line we cross

    biden is barking up the wrong tree seeing as how he is a state’s rights supporter

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Keep in mind that you can add “but states rights” to any situation. Sadly, that’s part of the US religion and people will defend their ability to treat their own residents horridly.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it really? How about we cut off ALL federal aid and services?

      I can’t believe you actually said we should have fed laws. You must be a troll.

      • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        states in the end decide if they want federal aid and services such as SNAP

        US lets the states decide because it has devolved into a state’s right over federal country

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not what you said.

          You said there should be federal laws. There are. Try taking pot across state lines via airplane and see if you get caught and which laws you get charged under.

          • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            depends on the state lines you cross and how that state or now city feels about it

            some cities in the US are half illegal and half recreational and or medical so sometimes it is a half of the city line

            the states also decide if they want to use federal or state laws when convicting not the federal government

            anyone who has extensively travelled the US will see past the HOA looking veil

            federal laws have devolved into something that allows states full control