Donald Trump was supposed to have to post a $464 million bond by Monday or else the state of New York could begin collecting on the massive civil fraud judgment leveled against him earlier this year. An appeals court bailed him out, blocking collection of the judgment and giving the former president 10 days to post a drastically reduced $175 million bond.
The order is a huge win for Trump, whose assets were going to be subject to seizure if he couldn’t post nearly half-a-billion dollars by Monday. His lawyers said last week he wasn’t going to be able to come up with the money after 30 underwriters rejected him. The New York Times has reported that Trump is expected to be able to scrounge the new, reduced $175 million bond
Sigh. Evergreen:
This sucks, but a few points are at least worth mentioning:
-
Of the five judges listed on the order, annoyingly slim as it is, three are Democrats and two are “nonpartisan” but with resumes in the public sector and public interest law.
-
Most states actually have a cap on appeal bonds, often around $50 million or less. NY doesn’t have one, but all the same thinking, for good or for ill, that would lead to a statutory limit might influence the appeals court here. Among them is precluding additional litigation from forcing a fire sale.
-
In an appeal like this, the court has to at least conceptually imagine that there’s some possibility of success, and that with a defendant who is leveraged AF and not nearly as liquid as he boasts, there is only one bite at the apple when seizing and selling the assets to satisfy the judgment. If the court is convinced that this amount, well into nine figures, will occupy the vast majority of his liquid assets and insure some plausible compensation for the plaintiff, and the other assets aren’t going anywhere, then it’s not insane to demand a bond more in line with the available liquidity.
Trump is definitely getting the “rich business owner with lots of lawyers” treatment here, and that’s certainly something you could criticize about the American legal system, but I don’t think we’re seeing some completely inexplicable abuse of existing civil procedure. The orange turd still gets the due process that a President Turd would deny to so many others.
TL;DR: it’s possible the only thing the Appeals Court is saying is that ol’ Donny really can’t get the bigger bond and that Trump Tower will still be there to seize later.
I heartily disagree on these limits being to prevent a fire sale. They’re to protect the wealthy from a fire sale. You or I would be forced into a fire sale in a heartbeat for a million dollar judgement. And then into debtor’s prison when we turn out to be normal people who don’t have a million dollars of assets lying around.
And this is why I love Lemmy. Where else would you get a well reasoned explanation like this?
Five comments down, maybe, but I’ll take what we can get.
I can’t say I’m surprised by this, and while I hate Trump, it’s not for the cynical reason. It’s going to be quite the nightmare unwinding those transactions. My understanding is that NY doesn’t have a right of redemption after a Sheriff’s sale. While this is judicious, I would prefer Trump be given no quarter.
-
If they started auctioning off and selling his properties to make money, it would turn over a lot of really dark stones full of other people’s criminal activities.
He’s being protected by the club he’s in, not because they like him but because they would be in trouble if they didn’t.
That’s the basis of the system, mulually assurred corruption.
That’s why Epstein Epsteined himself
More over, the precedent set here is beneficial to other wealthy individuals.
Other wealthy individuals, even those who sit on the complete opposite side of Trump politically benefit from the appeals court’s judgement. It really is just corruption all over.
Banks, mega corporations, (fake) rich people get bailed out — Republicans: Nothing.
Working-class doing public service get minor bailout with student loan forgiveness — Republicans: WHOA, NOW…
Oh, okay, cool, so the justice system cares if you say it’s unfair and you can’t afford the judgment now? Because I’m pretty sure that’s news to most people.
We wouldn’t want to ruin his future. He has real potential!
Oh sorry, wrong case.
I have lost all faith in our justice system.
“Justice system” is a misnomer. “Legal system” is more apt.
There was never reason to have faith in it to begin with.
It’s a justice system that began with maintaining the institution of chattel slavery and continues to maintain the institution of slavery through the prison system, and convicting black people more often and for longer sentences.
I have lost all faith in our
justicesystem.
How funny would it be if he can’t raise the $175 million either.
Dianne T. Renwick, Anil C. Singh, Lizbeth González, Bahaati E. Pitt-Burke, and Kelly O’Neill Levy
What was their actual individual motivation?
Rules for thee but not me me!!
Theres been a lot of shit over the last few years that really have put into perspective how if you have enough money in America you can get away with anything and this is maybe in the top 3, this guy should be in state prison and the management of the cases and responses have made it so he’s been a free man for nearly a decade, what the fuck.
Damn. I was really hoping this would be a ray of light for the next year and a reduction in the level of election insanity we’re going to see.
Instead, just more fuel for the flames.
You know, it’s almost like the justice system has… I dunno. Problems or something.
burn this country down
Rule of law either doesn’t apply or is very lenient to rich people.
The application of the rule of law being dependent on the size of one’s bank account has long been a proud bipartisan tradition in this country.
So we can all just do whatever we want without consequences right? Or is it still just rich fascists the rules don’t apply to?
