• grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      first world country

      That just means NATO, not high on the human development index.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          See, now that terminology works much better! The counterpart to it is “developed” not “first world,” though.

          Examples:

          • “Switzerland is a developed, third world country.”
          • “The US is a developing, first world country.”

          (Disclaimer: I’m neither agreeing or disagreeing with folks’ assessment of the US, just discussing categories.)

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not in my area. Our local ISPs are great, I have 2 options for fiber at affordable prices, with no data caps. Fuck comcast and AT&T - it’s the biggest ISPs that push bullshit like that on the public.

  • triped@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean this is nice and all but for it to matter I would need to have options available.

    • benignintervention@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Comcast raised my rate my 30% a few weeks ago and I went on a rage filled search for a replacement. The only other providers are either barely usable or starlink.

      • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Call up, say you want to cancel, because you found a deal with another internet provider for whatever low price you paying originally. After they confirm you’re “sure you want to leave” they’ll offer you the reduced rate in return for you staying on with them. I’ve done it a couple times now, cuts my internet bill in half for like a year

        • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That used to work. Tried that with Comcast a few months ago; they refused to match AT&T’s price for the same speeds. So I’m with AT&T now.

      • AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Did you accept a “free” upgrade a while back? That’s what happened to me and at some point they made my bill reflect the speed they were giving me. I then immediately downgraded back to what I originally had.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was in a neighborhood where we had FOUR competitors, all giving reasonable pricing. I immediately went to customer service and told them I’m switching, and they magically found a way to keep me happy.

      I am now in a neighborhood with only Comcast cable and Verizon DSL. The pricing is $40 vs $120 for basic speed. The competition when there’s only two carriers is a lie.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At the very least, Rocket Money has a service where they call your cable company and get you a reduced rate in exchange for a cut of what you save. It’s a lot more convenient and effective than doing it yourself. I hate that the system has come to this, but it’s better than paying full price for a service you are basically forced to use.

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Today’s nationwide launch of the Broadband Consumer Labels means internet service providers are now required to display consumer-friendly labels at the point of sale,” the Federal Communications Commission said. “Labels are required for all standalone home or fixed Internet service or mobile broadband plans. Providers must display the label—not simply an icon or link to the label—in close proximity to an associated plan’s advertisement.”

    The labels are required now for providers with at least 100,000 subscribers, while ISPs with fewer customers have until October 10, 2024, to comply. “If a provider is not displaying their labels or has posted inaccurate information about its fees or service plans, consumers can file a complaint with the FCC Consumer Complaint Center,” an agency webpage says.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        The democrats just got majority of the FCC in October. They passed this, and are almost ready to reenact Net Neutrality, despite Carr’s stalling tactics.

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What country? Anyway, good, good.

    EDIT: ah, USA. Fix your ISPs already.

  • Winged_Hussar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol, all of Spectrum’s plans (outside gig) say “Typical Upload: 10Mbs or higher”

    Why is it so hard for ISPs to provide a higher upload speed

    • icedterminal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Balancing, customer needs, limitation of hardware/infrastructure. Copper doesn’t handle symmetrical download and upload as well (this is where fiber comes in). There can be too much noise resulting in degraded consistency. Its prone to interference and leaks. To improve reliability, you get asymmetrical plans. Most people just want download. Which has historically been the cheaper choice. An example local to my area, a home plan will be 800 down and 20 up. A business plan will be 500 down and 300 up. The business plan costs more.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They had to give you a price and a speed, but often that price gets jacked way up with hidden fees, and the speeds they provide are usually just speeds you could get during off peak hours.

  • Confused_Emus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google has its issues as a company, but I’m pretty happy with symmetrical gigabit for $70.70 a month. I’m pretty sure 2 gigabit, and possibly 5, are also available at my location, but I’d have to upgrade all my network stuff to use that.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now all we have to do is get ISPs to define what they consider a data cap.

    Every single ISP has unlimited Internet as long as you don’t exceed a certain amount of data and then you get 56k speeds.

  • kelargo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cable companies need to be forced to provide alternative last mile providers, just like DSL is for telcos. There’s no reason PPPoE can not work in cable network infrastructure.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I recently switched back to AT&T since they’re currently in a non data-cap phase. Hopefully this will keep them there.

  • theparadox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Checking the details of my plan revealed they stopped giving me a paperless discount months ago. I guess I know what I’ll be doing for the next four hours…

    Also confirmed I still get sub 25Mbs upload unless I stick to their most expensive plan… at which point I get sub 40Mbs. I hate to say this, but I miss having an area served by Verizon FiOS.