• RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why are the different scales connected? How exactly does one interpolate between agreeableness and neuroticism? This is the kind of diagram I used to draw as an 8 year old, and they put this crap in a real product…

    • maniclucky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They shouldn’t be plotted that way technically. The big 5 are independent traits so they should essentially be sliders, not linked like that.

      That said, it’s way easier to see the points when you do that. Easy to miss when colors swap, for example, without the lines when you’ve been looking at this stuff for a few hours.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m not working right now because I’m putting my daughter through online school. (Also due to an illness) She graduates in five years.

    I am never getting another job, am I?

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I have a MfA from Parsons and 25 years of experience, and I’m having an incredible amount of difficulty finding a job in my field.

      You’re not alone.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Just have a bookshelf behind you during the interview, you’ll be golden.

      Or maybe have the oval office as a backdrop, that might really make you qualified.

  • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I do that shit when I have a web interview. Let up a guitar just visible in the camera, a small bookshelf, a floor lamp, make sure my tennis bag is visible despite not playing in ages…

    Whether they realize it or not, people do take this stuff in. Not sure why some algorithm based on these very same interviews wouldn’t do the same.

  • SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    One web LLM I was screwing around with had Job Interview as a preset. Ok. Played it totally straight the first time and had a totally positive outcome. Thought the interviewer way too agreeable. The next time I said the most inappropriate stuff I could imagine and still the interviewer agreed to come home with me to check out the rock collection I keep under my bed and listen to Captain Beefheart albums.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    There’s a ton of great small scale things we can do with machine learning, and even LLM.

    Unfortunately, it seems the main usages will be crushing people down even more.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yup. AI should be used to automate all of the mundane day-to-day BS, leaving us free to practice art, or poetry, or literature, or study, or just do leisure activities. Because all of the mundane BS is automated, so we don’t need to worry about things like income or where our next meal comes from. But instead, we went down the dystopian capitalist timeline, where we’re automating all of the art so artists are forced to get mundane day-to-day BS jobs.

  • TAG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    That reminds me of the time, quite a few years ago, Amazon tried to automate resume screening. They trained a machine learning model with anonymized resumes and whether the candidate was hired. Then they looked at what the AI was looking at. The model had trained itself on how to reject women.