Lawmakers want to crack down on “junk fees,” but restaurants are trying to stay out of the fight.

Surcharges or fees covering everything from credit card processing to gratuities to “inflation” have become more popular on restaurant checks in recent years.

Last year, 15% of restaurant owners added surcharges or fees to checks because of higher costs, according to the National Restaurant Association. In the second quarter, 3.7% of restaurant transactions processed by Square included a service fee, more than double the beginning of 2022, according to a recent report from the company.

Opponents of the practice say those fees and surcharges may surprise customers, hoodwinking them into paying more for their meals at a time when their wallets are already feeling thin. Fed-up diners compiled spreadsheets via Reddit of restaurants in Los AngelesChicago and D.C. charging hidden fees. Even the Onion took a swing at the practice, publishing a satirical story in May with the headline “Restaurant Check Includes 3% Surcharge To Provide Owner’s Sugar Baby With Birkin.”

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    We need to go to what other countries do.

    No tips, people earn a living wage. And all taxes and percentage fee charges are baked into the price you see.

    If something is $99.99 on the sticker/menu, then you pay exactly $99.99

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Agreed. The counter argument is that every state and county has different tax rates. One valid reason taxes that are percentages.

      But the register can deal with all of that just fine.

    • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve been visiting Brazil the past couple weeks and this is something I see here, it’s so nice to not have to arbitrarily round up prices in my head to figure out the true cost before going to the register. I’ll miss that when I get back home.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 months ago

    The weirdest one has been watching the “15%+ service fee” go from groups of 8 to 5 in only 2 years.

    Also an easier way to alleviate junk fees would be to remove credit card transaction fees.

    You know the thing that banks have been exploiting for decades to make profit out of virtually nothing.

    It’s like paying for gamepass but for every time you open the game.

    And don’t come in here saying that it covers PCI DSS requirement. This technology is cheaper to run than a rassberrypi mining dodgecoin.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are quite a few places around me that add a service fee for everyone. I don’t frequent those places. Which is sad because some of them actually have good food.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just make people pay the fee when they dine and you will see how many switch to other payment options

  • hate2bme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    They should have started cracking down years ago when restaurants started charging “delivery fees” that the delivery drivers didn’t get.

  • Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    The credit card fee is the only one I don’t mind. CC fees siphon a lot more money out of what we pay than people think. It’s unfair that restaurants/stores have to take that hit because the CC industry has been successful in making credit cards ubiquitous.

    All those rewards we get as consumers for using CCs come straight from the vendors pockets, and the banks get a much larger cut of the fees than they “give” back via rewards.

    There is no reason why credit card fees need to be so steep in the digital age. And most vendor agreements require that vendors aren’t allowed to charge a separate CC fee to cover the cost to them, so they instead have to raise prices on all (cash) customers through a menu price hike.

    It’s the same kind of bullshit as Apple requiring that app owners are not allowed to sell their app on other platforms for less than their Apple Store price.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah. I used to work at a retailer that had a credit card for the business. People think the incentive for the business is to get the $80 commission for signing up new people. And while that’s nice, the real reason for us was that processing fees were waived at our store for anyone using the card.

      That’s why you’ll get get more “points” for using the card at the retailer than you do elsewhere. That 2-3% back or whatever is way less than the processing fee the business would otherwise be paying.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.eeBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    THIS is why we need Government OUT OF OUR LIVES (except in the Bedroom and Doctors Office)! If these Regulations go away then OBVIOUSLY Prices will DROP!

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Add a service fee or an inflation fee if you’d like. I’ll circle it and leave a big fat 0 for the tip. Without it, I’ll leave 20% minimum. Problem solved.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Restaurant operators say the fees keep their menu prices lower, improve employee compensation and are better for customers.”

    HA!!! *but we want it this way so people don’t realize how expensive their meal will actually be until they’ve already eaten and it’s too late. We want to hide our profit grab in innocuous fees that visually feel like non-negotiable taxes they are just used to paying without objection!!!"

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    How enforceable are these fees? Like if I sat down, ordered from the menu with whatever set prices they had in the menu, get back a bill with fees added on that I never agreed to, what would happen if I just refused to pay those fees? Like I’m not coming back either way, so don’t care if they ban me, but can a restaurant tack on whatever they want and the police would treat it as a non-payment of what’s due or is the legal obligation only for the food ordered plus reasonable expectations added on (such as taxes, though personally I also believe they should be included in the advertised price)?

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      If it is listed on the menu, you must pay it. I can see if it’s not mentioned that you could make the case it’s BS, though

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Get rid of banks processing and merchant fees to start. Banks can make it by just fine without those.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Restaurants are seconds away from charging a per-bite subscription to their menu. 30 bites per month individual plan or shared 150 bites per month family plan

    • Any large bites count as 3 bites
    • All bites where you open your mouth are categorized as large bites.
    • Uneaten food is evaluated by our proprietary AI and given a remaining bite count (which is then doubled and subtracted from your regaining monthly bite total as a penalty).
  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago
    CNBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for CNBC:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    The Onion - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Onion:

    MBFC: Satire - Credibility: N/A - Factual Reporting: N/A - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://theonion.com/restaurant-check-includes-3-surcharge-to-provide-owner-1851474578/?utm_campaign=TheOnion&utm_content=1716484954&utm_medium=SocialMarketing&utm_source=twitter
    https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/24/restaurants-fight-ftc-junk-fee-crackdown-over-surcharges.html

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support