• Stamau123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 months ago

    In a last-minute move, they shut the event off from the public and even deliberately shared the wrong address for where grassroots supporters are allowed to gather."

    Lol, we’re fucked

    • hansolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Holy shit…

      Has anyone tried turning the party off and then on again?

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      They would rather gather the money needed to be able to effectively campaign than pursue policies designed to reign in campaigns costing so much. Wouldn’t it be nice if we legally defined our election season to the formerly traditional end of February to November of the year of your offices’ election?

  • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    The Democrats are over. If we ever even get the chance to vote again, a new progressive, actually left party must rise in its place

      • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Democrats aren’t left at all, they are effectively center-right.

        look at sinema and manchin, they led the biden administration.

        Its a big tent, and its drafty in here.

        • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Manchin and Sinema consistently voted against party lines and were known for being republicans running as democrats. They consistently blocked the DNC. This is a bad faith argument.

          • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Doesn’t matter, they set the boundaries for the party and they weren’t cast out or reprimanded effectively, ergo they led the Democratic party and the Biden administration.

            The DNC operates in bad faith on a constant basis, or have you forgotten Hillary’s superdelegates, or all the moderates coalescing around biden when bernie was winning the second time, its par for the course.

            The DNC only wins championing progressive policies and then turns around and fellates the most centrist most milquetoast moderates, its steeped in bad faith.

            • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Doesn’t matter, they set the boundaries for the party and they weren’t cast out or reprimanded effectively, ergo they led the Democratic party and the Biden administration.

              Democrats needed them to cooperate to get anything passed. If pressed too hard they would’ve switch republican and democrats would’ve gotten so little legislation passed that they would’ve been identical to the leftists that have never accomplished anything.

              This is a foreign concept to leftists because leftists don’t get elected let alone get legislation passed. Or understand the importance of voting as you’re proving.

              Working together to get a trusted candidate elected is also a foreign concept. That is why every progressive that gets elected ends up being a republican (Fetterman, Sinema, etc.).

              Yet we still have leftists complaining that the DNC won’t have open primaries. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me more than once, I must be a leftists.

              The DNC wins by trying to cater to as many voters as possible because that’s the job of a politician.

              Leftists consistently lose by refusing to work with anyone outside of their ideology which is just a small fraction of the voters.

              • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yes, their strategy of crowbarring in the candidate their funders want via superdelegate or just unilateral appointment has really appealed to the majority of voters

              • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Damn you’re right that’s must be why Harris won so hard by campaigning with liz cheney 🤮.

                Keep losing, nobody wants what you’re selling.

                Move left or be left behind.

                • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Trump lost by more than Harris in 2020 then came back and won. If he followed your advice he wouldn’t have won in 2024.

                  Leave it to leftists (a group that never wins elections) to quit too soon.

        • Majorllama@lemmy.worldBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ok so just for a moment let’s pretend you are now democratic God/king/ emperor.

          You get to build the new party of the left. What policies are you going to run on to garner support from the majority of Americans? I am genuinely curious what you imagine this ideal left wing party to look like.

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        Progressives won in states where Harris lost, so objectively, yes. We don’t need Republicans and Diet Republicans. We need two noticeably different parties.

        • dan1101@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The voters that elected Trump hate progressives. Those are the the libs they want to “own.” The only way becoming more progressive would help is if millions of people that didn’t vote in the 2024 election vote for the progressive candidate.

          • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            Considering there were about 90 million (archived) who didn’t vote in 2024, that seems totally possible. Harris only lost by about 2-3 million, so we’re talking 5% of this group needing to be the sort of “both parties are too right wing, there’s no point in voting” types who could be brought into our fold.

            • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              Reports are now showing over 4 million valid votes were rejected and purged by various voter suppression tactics taken between 2020 and 2024. Seems there might turn out to actually be something to the stolen election theory

      • hansolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They need to not be so locked in to the branding of existing Dems.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If there ever was a time to criticize the democrats, it is 3 months AFTER an election.

    If there ever was a time to not to criticize the democrats, it is 3 months BEFORE an election.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      there has to be a real fear of losing something, otherwise there’s no pressure to change. they will never change voluntarily. and after they win/lose an election there is zero pressure to do anything

      the best time to criticize is in the immediate lead up to an election

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s fair, I normally try to shut down the shitting on all the time, but that’s a very fair point to be making and I accept your views as veritable and righteous.

    • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      You think if we criticize democrats for 3.5 years straight it wont affect the outcome of an election as long as we stop for a few months?

      • randon31415@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Acknowledge mistakes and learning from them is the biggest advantage when running against the Republicans who think Trump can never make mistakes

  • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    True, but the way I see it elections are largely a game of name recognition.

    Love or hate Trump, people know his name.

    Harris only had 3 months to campaign and still almost beat Trump.

    Sure, major cities can handle a quick turnaround, but the rest of the country needs a full year of campaigning to accept a candidate.

    Trump’s win isn’t the mandate he thinks it is and Harris’ loss isn’t as damning as people make it out to be either.

  • dariusj18@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    ITT people who have no idea how the Democratic party is structured, nor how the DNC chair is elected, nor been involved in party politics, complaining about the DNC anyway.