• agingelderly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    What does it say about women speaking again?

    I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.”

    • TunaLobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Paul probably didn’t write that paragraph of verses. It was most likely added by someone else along the way.

      To your point of people wanting to take only portions of the Bible literally and ignore others, there are TONS of things that the old testament says to do that we don’t do every day.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Christians on old testament laws:

        • prohibition on eating pork: god actually didn’t mean we should stop eating pork. It was an accident bro.

        • prohibition on vaguely sexual acts without clear translation: this is the word of god, how dare these people exist

      • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nah, I can see Paul saying that, I just cannot see Jesus (who was openly kissing women like men kissed men and basically publicly recognising them as equals! The horror, lol) saying that. 🤷

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    Equally controversial fact:

    I am not obliged by law or morality to follow what is written in your fucking book either way.

  • elbiter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    What should be controversial is pretending a goat shepherds religious book from the bronze age should have any kind of authority in the 21st century.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, if the goat shepherds have some strong moral positions, I don’t see why they’d be disqualified. Ethics isn’t something we invented in the 21st century, ffs. Bronze Age humans had as much a claim to it as anyone. Just ask Socrates or Confucius or Nezahualcóyotl.

      Given the current state of the 21st century political scene, I’m not bending over to give modern day philosophers extra credit. Say what you will about Thomas Aquinas, he doesn’t appear anywhere in the Epstein flight logs. That’s more than Noam Chomsky or Peter Mandelson can claim.

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Bible is very contradictory because it’s a collection of books written throughout millennia, usually with prophets saying A and judges and scholars saying B (and people usually following B).

    And I see Stanzi is on her Madonna-styled Trinitarian rebellion, lol. I love her content, hopefully she’s not doing too many bumps!