The man who stole and leaked former President Donald Trump and thousands of other’s tax records has been sentenced to five years in prison.

In October, Charles Littlejohn, 38, pleaded guilty to one count of unauthorized disclosures of income tax returns. According to his plea agreement, he stole Trump’s tax returns along with the tax data of “thousands of the nation’s wealthiest people,” while working for a consulting firm with contracts with the Internal Revenue Service.

Littlejohn leaked the information to two news outlets and deleted the documents from his IRS-assigned laptop before returning it and covered the rest of his digital tracks by deleting places where he initially stored the information.

Judge Ana Reyes highlighted the gravity of the crime, saying multiple times that it amounted to an attack against the US and its legal foundation.

  • DharkStare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    ·
    1 year ago

    The judge compared Littlejohn’s actions to those of the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, noting that, “your actions were also a threat to our democracy.”

    Because stealing and releasing tax documents is the same thing as attempting to violently overthrow the government.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yet holding onto classified documents, then hiding them and lying about it to investigators for months gets nothing but a very stern finger-wagging?

    • PrettyLights@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      …because the leaker plead guilty. If he went to trial this would have taken longer.

      Does no one read the article or understand basic legal processes?

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Technically the pleading guilty part is also in the footer below the post for users on desktop, but I was making a statement about due processes rather than complaining Charles case was too quick. Kind of akin to how a person mentions the beauty of the colors of clouds or the dread incurred by a coming storm just for somebody else to come along and yell “…Obviously. Does nobody watch the forecast or understand basic meteorology?”

      • MrModule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So let me ask you something. What do you get out of this? Hanging around in places where you believe that all the people are wrong and foolish? Waiting for some comment that’s just low enough hanging fruit for you to know enough to have a basic response to, does this satisfy you? Your statement is no shit and your question is rhetorical. Do you just like standing in the middle of a crowd and screaming, denoting yourself separate and superior? Is this what you do online?

        • PrettyLights@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I like to have a diversity of thought and thought the Fediverse of all places would be promoting that. Instead everyone lumps into tribes and follows groupthink without question.

          I’ve been here since LW started and belong here just as much as anyone else.

  • mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol check out this bs: "The judge compared Littlejohn’s actions to those of the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, noting that, “your actions were also a threat to our democracy.”

    “It engenders the same fear that January 6 does,” Reyes added."

  • raynethackery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you declare you are running for President, it should trigger an automatic disclosure of your entire tax record.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    They made an example of them. That judge is well enough off to be thoroughly upset that somebody might release their crooked tax documents.

    Honestly I think they should slip something into the law, for this type of leak if the person was lying and you release the document proving them lying that you get a slap on the wrist.

    • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. I mean, considering what they could have done, though, I’d say 5 years is less of a slap on the wrist, and more of a whack with a yardstick.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Could have done worse. Whistleblowers generally deserve significant leniency though I feel. Especially for a crime where no one was injured.

      • doricub@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, in the eyes of the judge and the lawyers, the crime was premeditated, covered up, and the defendant is remorseless. Pretty clear grounds to give the maximum penalty allowed by law.

        I believe the tax records for large corporations and the upper class should fax higher scrutiny without having to be publicly leaked.

        • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, however, power concedes nothing without a demand. The only thing the powerful fear is losing that power. You can call for higher scrutiny of the upper class and corporations all you like, but they won’t do it unless forced to. And they’re also the ones who write national policy, so good luck writing a law to force them to do anything. It will be shoved into a shredder the second it enters the DC city limits.

    • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I think they should slip something into the law

      Remind me again who are “they” exactly, and what are their incentives?

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are lawmakers.

        Incentives would be to engage whistleblowers, forcing all to be more transparent in cases where no one is physically harmed.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is like saying if you break into someone’s house and steal something that was stolen already then your crime is ok? “Two wrongs don’t make a right”

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, I’m saying that sometimes someone does the wrong thing for the right reasons and they deserve leniency

        I’m saying I’d like to see him tried and sentenced like he’s a billionaire.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right and Wrong are human concepts that change and adapt depending on the the motive of the story teller.

        Is killing another human being wrong? What if we call it Murder? What if we call it Self Defense? What if we call it Sacrifice? What if we call it War?

        All these words we use to describe the same thing, but whether its a Right or Wrong highly depends on the era, local, and values of the story teller.

        Was it wrong for Americans to help slaves escape to the north before the Civil War? That was illegal. Our hiding Jews during the Holocaust? That was also illegal.

        Would it be ok to break into my neighbor’s house if I saw them drag another human being against their will, but the cops wont do anything because I can’t prove it? Pretty sure a jury wouldn’t fault me Breaking and Entry for that.

  • bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Aight, I mean sure. It was wrong, but 5 years? I understand that not all judges sentence in the same way but 5 years? Insurrection gets basically gets butt pats and this guy gets 5 years?

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How did they get him tried and sentenced so fast?

    Every time I question why Trump isn’t in jail already people keep telling me “these things take time”.

    Given that Trump is a high profile case, allowing them to take twice the time of a normal person would have still put him behind bars already.

  • rustydomino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know if this sort of thing is allowed, but if outsiders can donate money to his prison commissary account, I will definitely donate.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    If society survives long enough for this to become history, the act will be seen as as heroic. The hardest thing for the relatively comfortable, myself included, to do these days is risk that relative comfort and sacrifice our futures (civil and professional) for something that acts against all of the slow motion attacks on democracy going on right now. I don’t know enough about him individually to say, but the act on its face us heroic and needed.

  • aulin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Coming from. Sweden where all tax records are public, it seems insane to get 5 years for revealing taxes.