• Soupbreaker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, it’s currently at number 50 on Wikipedia’s list of wars by death toll (out of 130 listed conflicts). I feel like that might qualify as one of the most destructive, but it’s obviously a subjective description.

      Also, at the time, it would have been quite a bit higher on the list.

      • Imperious_melange@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just for reference the /s is an internet wide symbol for sarcasm aka I’m joking. Near its peak (1860) about 1.4% of Americans owned slaves. In the states where slavery was legal, approximately 25% of all white households owned at least one enslaved person, and in the Deep South, this figure approached 50%. So yeah states rights to own slaves.

        • Broadfern@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re good lol I was just riffing. I appreciate the sincere explanation though /gen /pos 😄

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Welcome to industrialization

    Industrialization in the form of the cotton gin was one of the main reasons slavery was so profitable in the South. What are you talking about?

    • Staples_McGee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Slavery was even dying before the cotton gin was invented. It’s inventor even thought it would end slavery; but ironically for him, it did the opposite.

      Turns out if you can use less slaves to make the same amount of cotton, demand goes up and thus supply must too.

    • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m talking about basing an economy off of one export and then starting a war with the dudes who have all the boats and manufacturing!

      • zxqwas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        A southerner would think they would lose the export anyway due to abolition. So gambling on the union not being that keen on fighting may be sensible.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    While the rest of the world perfects wind and solar, the United States is fighting a bloody, expensive war for oil.

    Same or different?