• I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a flower that makes people happy and hungry. God fucking damn it. There is no fucking reason to destroy people’s lives over this.

  • vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand how 40 years of prison for a non-violent crime isn’t considered to be both “cruel” and “unusual”. It is objectively cruel. I certainly hope that it is also unusual. I certainly hope that there aren’t many more like him, imprisoned for decades for what amounts to personal-use levels of pot. 5.5 lbs of pot when you include the stem and roots isn’t that much and certainly sounds like a personal supply to me.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Try to overthrow the government- 18 months. Grow plants- life sentence.

    America (for the time being), fuck yeah!

  • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Life sentence for growing some pot. Meanwhile the Jan 6th insurrectionists are getting maybe 2 years, or if you’re a card carrying proud boy terrorist you might be looking at up to 20 years.

  • scottywh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Alabama has an incredible climate for growing outdoor Cannabis, too…

    It should literally be everywhere there.

    • m3t00🌎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      a friend in highschool used to collect all the seeds and scatter them around town. de-seeding was part of the low-grade weed ritual. seeds would explode and blow-up your joints or bowls

  • BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty messed up. Let this poor guy go. On the bright side, does free healthcare and free room and board?

    • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Free healthcare in that the prison doctor or nurse will refuse to diagnose him with anything until he’s on his death bed and then give him comfort release so they don’t have to take care of him?

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember these headlines any time someone makes excuses for the lack of action by the Federal Government, even when we give Democrats Congress and the presidency.

    • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I hope you don’t consider the 50-50 split Senate to be one of the times we “gave Democrats Congress and the presidency”. Do you think they were going to find 10 Republicans and overcome the filibuster for that legislation?

      The last time the Democrats had control that gave them a realistic chance of doing something like this, marijuana legalization didn’t even have majority support in the US. Even among Democrats it was pretty divided.

      The time before that, Bill Clinton was president and was under fire for admitting he had ever tried marijuana in his life, and had to claim he “didn’t inhale”.

      And those were all the times in my life that the Democrats had any sort of majority in Congress and a Dem president.

      You make it sound like there have been these chances over and over. But there isn’t even one single time you can look back at and say “right here, you had all the opportunity in the world and we asked you to do it, and you didn’t do it”.

        • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s really all you have to say? Your statement that I responded to strongly suggested at least one, if not multiple, clear opportunities to make major changes to marijuana law that Democrats didn’t take. Are you not interested in the fact that that is not true?

          Your reaction is like if someone pointed out factually wrong statements made by an antivaxxer and the antivaxxer responded with “I guess I shouldn’t try to protect my body”. No, that part is perfectly fine, it’s that you should just use actual facts or you could end up deciding on a course of action that is diametrically opposed to the outcome you want!

          I expect better – from you!