The new labels allow employees to change prices as often as every ten seconds.

“If it’s hot outside, we can raise the price of water and ice cream. If there’s something that’s close to the expiration date, we can lower the price — that’s the good news,” said Phil Lempert, a grocery industry analyst.

Apps like Uber already use surge pricing, in which higher demand leads to higher prices in real time. Companies across industries have caused controversy with talk of implementing surge pricing, with fast-food restaurant Wendy’s making headlines most recently. Electronic shelf labels allow the same strategy to be applied at grocery stores, but are not the only reason why retailers may make the switch.

  • fury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    “If it’s hot outside, we can raise the price of water and ice cream.”

    Dude actually said that out loud. Wild. Teach me how to give that little of a fuck.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    If it’s hot outside we can raise the price of water…”

    Holy fuck dude that’s some endgame capitalism right there.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    On the shelves, surge pricing.

    Weekend evenings, pizza and beer prices skyrocket. Rest of the week evenings, staples are higher like beef, chicken, etc. Holidays, Turkey prices go up the closer to thanksgiving you get. Plastic cups, paper plates, grilling necessities go up approaching the 4th of July.

    “Oh, but it’s just shortages…”

  • Jubei Kibagami@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is gonna suck for restockers when a lot of items get left at the cashier’s because Walmarts ghouls decided to raise the price between shelf and checkout.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    If it’s hot outside, we can raise the price of water and ice cream.

    If people are starving after a natural disaster, we can raise the price of everything because they’re desperate and have no alternatives.

    • Captain Janeway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Are we to judge simple supply and demand now? If they haven’t been smart enough to save for a disaster, then perhaps they deserve what they get. If they would rather die they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population. Bah. Humbug. A poor excuse for picking a man’s pocket every natural disaster.

      /S

  • Rufus Q. Bodine III@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    So Walmart can easily raise the price while an item is in your shopping cart? Pick up a $6 bag of Cheetos and pay $8 at the self serve checkout.

  • Adalast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Don’t worry, they will also be making it so you have to use their data mining apps that require unconscionable permissions just to see that they are changing prices every 10 seconds.

  • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    While the labels give retailers the ability to increase prices suddenly, Gallino doubts companies like Walmart will take advantage of the technology in that way.

    “To be honest, I don’t think that’s the underlying main driver of this,” Gallino said. “These are companies that tend to have a long-term relationship with their customers and I think the risk of frustrating them could be too risky, so I would be surprised if they try to do that.”

    Rather than seeing an opportunity to use surge pricing, Gallino says retailers are likely drawn to electronic shelf tags to ensure consistency between online and in-store pricing.

    This person must live on another planet.

    Sure, the prices won’t be changing every six seconds, but anyone with half a mind can see these tags won’t be used only when stock or expiry are a factor. The prices will be up on the weekend to start. Then later it’ll be changing through the day to get higher prices between 4:00-7:00 when people are getting off work.

    The arguments of no longer needing people to do yet another menial task and increasing utility of labels for consumers both have merit, but this alien even says the primary factor:

    “The bottom line … is the calculation of the amount of labor that they’re going to save by incorporating this."

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    “If it’s hot outside, we can raise the price of water and ice cream. If there’s something that’s close to the expiration date, we can lower the price — that’s the good news,” said Phil Lempert, a grocery industry analyst.

    One half of that is good news for one party and bad news for the other and the other half is the opposite.

    I think this person needs a psychological evaluation.

  • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    I hope this means that there won’t be any more junk mail bullshit adverts in my mailbox trying to get me to go to their stores- since they’ll change prices on a whim- there’s no need for them any more.

  • geekworking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Just wait until they track your phone in the stores and tie it to demographics like where you live and profession to build a financial profile to estimate how much you are able to pay. As you walk down aisles, the prices change to your price to gouge out every possible penny from you.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I can see this happening 100%. It’s already kind of a thing in home renovation and construction. Some businesses will charge you a higher hourly labor rate if your materials are expensive. Installing tile or whatever should be the same labor rate, but they assume customers buying expensive materials “must be rich” and won’t blink at paying more for labor, too. They don’t all do this, of course, but it’s something to watch out for (and one of many reasons you should always get multiple estimates from different contractors).

    • jpeps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This as exactly my thought. It’s not crazy to imagine this when I know for a fact systems exist in supermarkets to calculate optimal prices in different stores, based on the size of the store, the demographics of the area it’s in etc

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nah fuck that, first off fuck you for stealing and secondly, it is way worse for these shitheads to have stock sit around and go bad instead of marking it as a loss cuz stolen.

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ooooo. Can’t wait till a hurricane is coming and they raise the price of water and canned food.

    I wonder how much price gouging will be permitted. If they can raise the price of water when it’s hot then could they raise it “just enough” to not get in trouble with the state when a hurricane is coming

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Price gouging is effectively legal in red states. Conservatives do not prosecute businesses for harming people for profit.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Three thirsty people walk out of the desert, one at a time, and walk up to a water salesman. The first has $1, the second has $10, and the third has $100. What should the salesman charge in order to maximize profit while keeping all the customers happy?

    $1 sounds reasonable, if their are other water salesmen it would probably be the best price, but it leave a lot of money on the table.

    $10 sounds good, since 2/3s of the customers will get water and the saleman gets 600% more money.

    $100 is the price that gets the most money, but leaves 2/3s thirsty and is way above what you should charge for water.

    The answer, strangely, breaks the notion of “fair”. Let us pretend that these three bottles of water are the only sale this salesman will ever make, quitting the business right afterwards. Also, let us say that none of the three will ever see the other two people’s transactions. The answer then is to charge the first man $1, the second $10, and the third $100. Everyone gets water and the salesman gets the maximum amount of money. The problem is that we, subconsciously, feel that this is ‘unfair’ even though everyone got what they wanted. The ethical would set it at $1 while the businessmen would set it at $100 while trying to drive everyone else out of business. But what if the rich could be charged more than the poor? What if sales were based off of what each individual was willing to pay instead of which fixed price would garner the most profit?

    Would this be a better world or a worse one?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The answer then is to charge the first man $1, the second $10, and the third $100.

      Would the ethical answer not be $0, on the grounds that all individuals are entitled to basic living needs regardless of their personal wealth?

      • randon31415@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, that maximizes happiness at the expense profit, the polar opposite of setting it at $100 to maximize profit at the expense of happiness.

  • catbum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Alright, so I quite literally haven’t stepped foot into Walmart since June of 2015. The only money I’ve given them since was for two grocery pick-ups during early COVID when it was in a 5% cashback category on my CC. I have no idea of what changes have been made in the physical stores since then, and this sounds … Horrifying. What happens if the price changes before you check out? I would feel duped. Are they going to make you “check in” when you enter so they can give you the price at time of entry? Or are you SOL if you don’t make it to the cash register in time? And wouldn’t that extra rush to get out make them lose money on stuff you pick up wandering around? Or maybe they want you in and out as fast as possible. What a clusterfuck.

    I do love telling people about my Walmart-less living when it suits the conversation, and 90% of the time they are shocked, absolutely flabbergasted. “How can you do that?! Where do you get all of your stuff?!?” Well, like many middling American cities home to at least 20,000 people, there is a Target, Walgreens, a regional grocery store, Maurices, and for some reason like 12 auto parts stores right down the street. I can’t recall anything in Walmart, aside from exclusive clothing brands (if you can call them that), that I haven’t found elsewhere in at least some quantity-per-package. I get that people want a one-and-done shopping experience, but besides my routine Aldi stops, I don’t shop that much anymore, even online.

    My reasons? I would like to say that I am boycotting them for paying shit wages, being viciously anti-union, and all the other ethical shortcomings that never seem to improve. And that definitely is a part of it. But the main reason, the one setting me on my path toward Walmart Recovery (I should start up a Wal-Anon) was from the experience I had the night I needed to buy a broom, my last night or day in that store.

    It was somewhere between 11 and 1 am (definitely after 11) and I had just moved house into a… House. (I was in an apartment previously.) The place needed a serious cleaning, and I simply did not have the correct broom for the job. Picked out the broom and a few other cleaning things, all was well. But shortly before checking out, a group of rowdy youngsters in their late teens sidled by me, laughing about something while also eyeballing my cart with the broom and other boring household accoutrements. I was but 23. I guess I hadn’t shaken the adolescent anxiety of feeling judged about appearances and actions at that point, but the thought that these slightly younger peers were making fun of my broom shopping was too much to bear.

    “Oh my gawd, who buys a broom on a Friday night?? Get a life, ya loser.”

    “I did. I did get a life! I’m moving on up, bitches! I went from a 500 sqft apartment to an 800 sqft house with fuckin windows on all sides! I can put plants in every room, every nook and tiny-ass cranny! And I can bring my cat! And if that damn house of mine needs a broom at midnight, then my gods, I am going to go out and fucking GET ONE.”

    Anyway, that’s my story about how I broke up with Walmart. DM me for requests to join Wal-Anon, we have plenty of seats for everybody! (The room will be free of any and all Mainstays furnishings and the coffee will be served sans Great Value cups, I assure you.)