• Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I thought they put the terrorist charge on him precisely to avoid requiring a jury as part of all the rights privileges we surrendered post 9/11 in the name of… Pffff… National security.

    National security being hilarious considering the CEOs are still walking the streets free, murdering citizens for profit having never not being actively sucked off by legislators that passed the patriot act and similar legislation.

    The murderous Shareholders are already inside the house. They own the house. You can barely afford to rent it from them.

    • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t think that’s why they charged him with terrorism. The reason that some terrorism trials are (were?) done in secret in the past I believe is because most of the evidence that would have been presented would have been classified. I don’t think there is any classified evidence related to Luigi’s trial.

      I think it’s more likely that they added the terrorism charge just as an enhancement to potentially add time to his sentence or more opportunities for him to be convicted of something. However, someone posted an insightful comment here a couple of days ago, pointing out that in order to prove terrorism they will have to discuss his motivations at length, which will only make him more sympathetic to most jurors.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It also lets the defense examine “would a killer target the United healthcare CEO specifically because they were personally evil vs a statement against the system?” That’s also helpful for a defense angling for a nullification mistrial.

  • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oh, so like when it goes the other way and the public decides someone is guilty long before they go to trial and prosecutors go after him anyway.

    Big deal. The jury will decide one way or another and I will be very surprised that the highest charges will stick if they get normal people on the bench.

    The fact that this guy had a manhunt out for him when people are murdered every day and nearly no resources are used at all to go after them is astounding. Just shows the law is there for the rich, not the rest of us.

    • nomous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 months ago

      There was another school shooting this week, i think that’s the 80th this year and people don’t seem to care. Why would anyone care about some parasite millionaire when innocent kids are gunned down everyday and that’s just the way it is.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The media likes to downplay that the CEO had straight up killed people. Eye for an eye applies. It would be a gross miscarriage of justice to find Luigi guilty.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    4 months ago

    There’s a McDonald’s worker able to be jury. Oh wait, he didn’t get the reward money as his claim got denied for bullshit reasons, just like insurance… Never mind.

    • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I understand that she can only get the money if he gets convicted. They’ll probably still find some other excuse not to pay her, but still - I argue that’s a pretty big bias that should disqualify her from jurying.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Maybe this is somewhat similar to a woman killing her rapist, after police refuse to investigate? There are probably examples of leniency in such cases.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s never “so much sympathy” for a killer cop, or genocide, but one CEO is just a step too far.

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Of course. He’s clearly not guilty. Thompson willingly surrendered his humanity a long time ago, and you can only commit murder against a human. What Luigi did was more like deconstructing a cardboard box or other inanimate object.

    He did however leave those shell casings on the sidewalk, and that’s just not cool. They should give him a ticket for littering and send him on his way.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’d be pretty rough if they couldn’t possibly find a jury that would convict, think of how the CEOs of the nation would feel if they realized fully just how many people are entirely okay with eating them.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think they know how out of touch they are. But they don’t understand the level of discontent across vast swaths of the large percent of the population that they would never dream of chatting with.

  • Jolly Platypus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s going to be really difficult to convict him, I’m happy to say. Dude’s a hero.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Part of what made Joan of Arc a name that has lasted 1000 years is not that she was a hero, it’s that she was killed for being a hero.

      Heroes get remembered, but legends never die.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        He’s already thrown away his life.

        Honestly it would be demoralizing for him to get sentenced to death (or life) in this information environment. People would just move on, back to the status quo. But if he gets off, its a vindication of what he did.

  • chakan2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    They will try Luigi until it sticks. It’s critical to the powerful that they send the message they are beyond reproach.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      Which is exactly why people like Luigi resort to the actions he took. It can never be undone no matter what they do to him afterwards.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      They will make it slow so they can twist the knife they shove into the publics stomach to keep everyone too scared to act. Government repression is the first cousin of terrorism, and Israel has innovated this year in making repression and racist terrorism cool again.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    And yet with millions of people to choose from I don’t think they will have a terrible time finding some that are pro-corporation and pro-billionaire and/or sufficiently against killing no matter what the justification.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The defense has to agree to the jury.

      There’s no way the prosecution can stack the jury with Musk fans or whatever, not a chance.