• gerbler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Keep in mind that the more muscle you build, the more energy it takes to move that muscle therefore the more calories you’ll burn during your activities through the day. It’s not necessarily about the calories you burn during the workout but the aggregate impact downstream.

      I could be wrong though I don’t go to the gym lol.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        By that logic a morbidly obese person is exercising harder than anyone else by moving their 600lb ass around the living room.

        • Delphia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          They are.

          A 600lb person walking a mile burns significantly more calories than a 200lb person doing the same thing. Im 200lbs and I can back squat 300lbs, a 600lb person squatting down and standing back up is moving more weight than I am… If they can manage it.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Calories out just need to exceed calories in. Diets help do that easier but it’s all the same principle

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, I just mean it’s easier to manipulate the intake side of the equation. Burning a couple hundred calories is a lot of work; choosing not to drink a soda is easy.

      • Belgdore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s important to note that “maintenance calories” are the vast majority of the energy you use on a daily basis. Exercise is just a small portion of the calories you burn.

  • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m gonna take. this opportunity to point out how stupid it is that 1 Calorie = 1kilocalorie. Actually my least favorite unit.

    • Tilgare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It took me a moment when I saw the pic to come to terms with the fact that, for as many times as I’ve seen kcal previously, I somehow never realized it was was short hand for kilocalories. 🤯

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    And since a kilocalorie is what we would call a “calorie” from food, this shows precisely how you can’t outrun a bad diet.

  • samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Imma take the escalator out of spite now. You’re not the boss of me!

  • hawgietonight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    A typical hamburger is about 500 kcal so you would have to go up those stairs 100 times to burn it off in theory.

    But science is now saying that burning off calories isn’t related to excersise… you burn the same amount doing or not doing physical activity. So I don’t know if this is relevant anymore.