• mesa@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    25 days ago

    I used to work in insurance. This might actually be the biggest blow to Testla, even more than stock prices. If people keep vandalizing the vehicles, eventually the insurance has to come due. And repair costs are not cheap, its basically only dealers and a limited number of repair places that partner.

    And insurance companies always make sure they get their money.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      25 days ago

      What kinds of vandalism are most costly to repair, without endangering the lives of drivers, passengers and people nearby? I want to see if those are mentioned in future news coverage.

      • mesa@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        25 days ago

        Paint probably.

        Also I would never support anything illegal. As the law requires.

      • despoticruin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        Well, a 1:1 mixture of chlorine bleach and vinegar should damn near instantly and permanently corrode the steel. Don’t breathe the fumes, but I have toyed with the idea of a squirt gun filled with instarust.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        25 days ago

        I wouldn’t go after individual Tesla owners. It wasn’t always like this. They adopted the earliest and cheapest (in the US) EV. I won’t buy one now, but I would have three years ago.

        I understand the dealership thing. Are most of them directly corporate?

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        Like others said, paint is expensive AF, but also the classic “Slash 3 tires” is expensive

        Extra expensive because Tesla’s (Well, EVs in general I’m pretty sure) need special and more expensive tires due to the weight

          • cm0002@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            25 days ago

            Only when all 4 are damaged, for reasons lol

            Hence the “slash 3” rule lmao

            • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              25 days ago

              Ah, but I thought the point of this thread was to keep the insurance pain building, so if we want higher premiums, should it be slash all 4 so they can claim it and wreck their rates?

              • cm0002@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                25 days ago

                Oh yea you’re right lmao, def need to slash all 4 for that lolol

                For legal reasons, this is a joke

            • Cornpop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              25 days ago

              I don’t believe this. And if it is the case I would just slash my 4th before make a claim. Stupid.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          25 days ago

          Don’t lose sight that you are committing a crime, you are destroying an innocent persons property, and you really have no excuses if caught by either the owner or the police

      • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        IIRC, if one or two tires, or all four tires are damaged, insurance will cover it. But insurance won’t cover three tires being damaged if I understand correctly. So slash three tires per car.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    So it’s actually working!
    That makes it more expensive to own a Tesla, and that’s one more thing that will make it less attractive to buy, either new or used.
    It’s debatable whether this is fair, but clearly it achieves a political goal.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      25 days ago

      Yup, my rates soared and insurance companies were dropping customers left and right. I had to abruptly trade it in and it definitely put me off buying Hyundai/Kia for the foreseeable future.

        • tiramichu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          25 days ago

          Ohh yeah. I remember the tech news coverage of the cars being so easy to steal, just didn’t realise there was a “challenge” about it. Unbelievable Hyundai and Kia got away without immobilisers for so long. Really cheeky of them to cut that corner, and it backfired.

  • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Ironically, even without the vandalism these cars were ridiculously expensive to insure. When I bought my EV I checked insurance premiums, and it would’ve cost $100/mo more to insure a model 3 similarly priced EV from another maker.

    this is what the fanbois never bragged about when the brand used to carry some level of prestige

  • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    Tesla had to create the own insurance because many companies and states won’t insure the cyber truck.

  • Taco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Bwahhahahahaaahaha!! 😂😂😂😂😂😂