The ex-Fox News host railed against decades of work to diversify the all-volunteer military as he announced initiatives to effectively exclude women from combat roles and relax protections against hazing and bullying of troops
More than 800 of America’s top military leaders sat silent and showed no reaction as ex-Fox News presenter turned Pentagon boss Pete Hegseth told them he was issuing a series of new directives that will make it harder for women to serve in combat and easier for personnel to engage in hazing and bullying without repercussions during an unprecedented gathering of flag-rank officers at a Marine Corps base in Virginia on Tuesday.
The Secretary of War — a title not used by the head of the U.S. military establishment since 1947 but revived by President Donald Trump earlier this month — told the group of admirals, generals, and their senior enlisted advisers he was “ending the war on warriors” and complained that too many of their peers had been put in their roles “for the wrong reasons” including their race and gender.
Standing in front of a large American flag backdrop, he attacked by name several of the leaders’ retired peers, telling them that the department’s “compass heading” was “clear.”
“Out with the Chiarelli, the McKenzies and the Milleys and in with the Stockdales the Schwartzkopfs and the Pattons,” he said, denigrating former Army Vice Chief of Staff General Peter Chiarelli, ex-U.S. Central Command commander and Marine Corps General Kenneth McKenzie Jr, and ex-Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman and Army General Mark Milley, each of whom has been critical of Trump or his administration.
“The sooner we have the right people, the sooner we can advance the right policies,” he added.
Hegseth also groused about efforts to open up combat roles to women and initiatives to “weed out so-called toxic leaders” and blamed “foolish and reckless” politicians for having “set the wrong compass” and causing the Pentagon to lose its way.
Hegseth, an Iraq War veteran who attained the rank of Major in the Army National Guard but became a critic of the Pentagon’s efforts to open up military service to women, racial minorities and LGBT+ persons, said the War Department must “restore a ruthless, dispassionate and common sense application of standards” that are “uniform, gender neutral and high.”
He told the assembled leaders he was issuing a directive to ensure that “every designated Combat Arms” role across all branches “returns to the highest male standard only,” all but reversing a 2015 directive from then-Defense Secretary Ashton Carter to open all combat roles to women.
“If you do not meet the male level physical standards for combat positions … it’s time for a new position or a new profession,” he said. “If women can make it excellent. If not, it is what it is. If that means no women qualify for some combat jobs, so be it.”
The War Secretary also claimed — without offering evidence — that the Pentagon had lowered standards “to hit racial quotas as well” and said the revised standards he was promulgating are based on what he called the “1990 test,” which compares today’s standards to those in 1990, a time when women were barred from combat roles and LGBT+ persons were banned from serving.
“The 1990s test is simple. What were the military standards in 1990 and if they have changed, tell me why was it a necessary change based on the evolving landscape of combat, or was the change due to a softening, weakening or gender based pursuit of other priorities? 1990s seems to be as good a place to start as any,” he said.
I wonder how generals feel about being told how to do their jobs by a major.
I’m sure they are hyped, delighted, and filled with espirit de corps about all of this.
Espirit de coup d’état?
“Hey you fat fucks, none of this girl shit. We’re going to all do push-ups and jack off to the good kind of porn and get cool Hearts of Iron 4 tattoos and pray to the Real Jesus and any of you phony losers who complains can hit the fucking bricks! Now lets go fight some wars because we love peace!”
Punches the air
Chops crotch repeatedly
Tries to do a stage dive, hesitates, and walks it back pretending to look cool about it
Yeah, I can’t imagine why this fell flat.
I ain’t gonna read it but did he really? I was wondering when the broke it up did anyone applaud?
Starting to think the military may be the last hope of true allegiance to the flag.
Trump needs a war to declare martial law and then undermine elections. He can then claim he’s only doing what Zelenskyy has done.
Think we also saw this tried in South Korea didn’t we?
He can claim anything, but Ukraine’s constitution doesn’t allow elections during war. America’s does.
In the backdrop of this, does that even remotely matter?
It only matters insofar as the courts uphold that; and even if they do, Courts have no enforcement arm to ensure adherence.
This will ultimately rest on how much individual states or these military generals want to unilaterally push back.
Ukraine’s constitution doesn’t allow elections during war
Seems like a big flaw in the Constitution, given that the public now has no way to remove leadership that’s running a war this badly.
Badly? Even Trump, Putin’s good buddy, has said that he believes Ukraine can not just win, but take back all the territory that Russia took. So, how is that running a war “badly”?
Seems useful at the moment, given Russia’s penchant for election interference.
Moldova just elected an EU-friendly government in a landslide, despite perpetual claims of election interference.
Poland and Romania also just put up a staunch anti-Russian nationalists.
The notion that Russia can rig elections in their favor hasn’t born out over the last two years. Anti-Russia candidates are sweeping Eastern Europe.
Is Moldova at war?
And how did Moldova achieve it? By booting out the obvious traitors.
A model for America.
Is Moldova at war?
Does it matter?
And how did Moldova achieve it?
They were the incumbent party and they grew their majority by pinning economic decline on the Russian invasion of their neighbor.
By booting out the obvious traitors.
The BEP wasn’t booted out. They have the second highest majority of MPs in Parliament.
A model for America.
:-/ Do you know anything about Moldovan politics?
The notion that Russia can rig elections in their favor hasn’t born out over the last two years.
Doesn’t mean they haven’t been trying
Which country should be holding elections, on these terms? It seems like everyone gets to claim a rival state is meddling in their politics.
And the current leadership is incentivized to keep the war going, so they can stay in power.
Look at reporting for any coup that has ever happened.
Take note of how those reports talk about which side has support of the military.
“The sooner we have the right people, the sooner we can advance the right policies,”
That was how it was when the Trump appointed Secretary made a department-wide speech where I work. The half of the crowd that sat through the whole thing went mild. Or, at least, that’s what I heard. I was in the other half.
I seem to remember the secdef from Trump 1 relieving the captain of an aircraft carrier of his command because he made public that there was a COVID outbreak on board and no accommodations were being made. It culminated with Secdef Shitheel getting on the intercom of this carrier and belittling the former captain in front of the entire crew. There’s videos some of the crew took.
I don’t even remember this guy’s name, but I do remember that, like Hegseth, he had little military experience to speak of. Most of his career was corporate management or something.
That’s what this admin loves. Worthless corpos and shitheel influencers belittling and browbeating the people who actually hold things together.
In a better timeline the top brass rushed the stage & pulled Kegseth apart like a chicken.
I’m sure more bigotry, bullying and hazing will be super helpful with that perpetual recruiting crisis.
“The sooner we have the right people, the sooner we can advance the right policies”…… holy shit.
This meeting could have been a signal chat
This meeting could have been skipped entirely. And doing so would have been less embarrassing for everyone.
What an insecure putz.
“The sooner we have the right people, the sooner we can advance the right policies,” he added.
WINK WINK
This was definitely something that could of been sent over email.
Its miniscule.
but I think after all those commanders getting corralled into what was essentially a coked out political campaign event. and listening to all the dumb shit that was said with 100% seriousness.
I think the chances of the Military doing a Coup against the US (Trump) Government, just rose from Zero, to nonzero.
Hegseth is such an insecure piece of shit just like his boss. What a fucking colossal waste of time and money for what was essentially a YouTube rant with homoerotic undertones about “male-level performance”.
I’d be laughing more if Trump and Hegseth weren’t actively looking to do their own version of Tiananmen Square.
What were the military standards in 1990 and if they have changed, tell me why was it a necessary change based on the evolving landscape of combat, or was the change due to a softening, weakening or gender based pursuit of other priorities?
I would argue that the number is boots on the ground, the actual number of troops ready to deploy is probably the most militarily significant factor in any military in history. That said, if laws changed to allow LGBT+ citizens to take part in the military, that likely increases the number of people volunteering to serve by about 10%. That seems incredibly significant to me.
Military voters tend to go to Republicans for some reason. Curious to see how they feel about republicans now. Probably no change I would guess.
Military voters tend to go to Republicans for some reason.
There’s generally a big split between the services and another between officers and enlisted. Air Force and Marines go conservative. Army and Navy tend to break towards the liberal end. Officers tend to like the old school Reagan Republicans and Conservative Democrats (they loved Jim Webb back in 2016). Enlistees tend towards the popular candidates - Trump and Sanders over Hillary and Jeb.
But a lot just boils down to the person being enlisted. You see all the same racial and religious crack ups in the military as you find in the civilian voter base, with white christian men from the interior tending conservative and colored non-christian women from the coasts tending liberal.
At the end of the day, they’re all over the map

Very interesting. I’d love to see 2024. Seemed like it was moving to the left, but could just be following the countrywide patterns.
They know he’s a sycophantic ass clown but the government has them cowed enough to keep mum












