Disney tried to force the case into arbitration by citing the agreement on the widower’s Disney Plus trial account.

Disney has now agreed that a wrongful death lawsuit should be decided in court following backlash for initially arguing the case belonged in arbitration because the grieving widower had once signed up for a Disney Plus trial.

“With such unique circumstances as the ones in this case, we believe this situation warrants a sensitive approach to expedite a resolution for the family who have experienced such a painful loss,” chairman of Disney experiences Josh D’Amaro said in a statement to The Verge. “As such, we’ve decided to waive our right to arbitration and have the matter proceed in court.”

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    137
    ·
    8 months ago

    “We got caught by the public, and we want to keep this excuse possible in the future. So we’re dropping it from now so the court doesn’t set a legal precedent that will fuck us over.”

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I fucking hate Disney.

    With such unique circumstances as the ones in this case, we believe this situation warrants a sensitive approach

    Yeah if they possessed sensitivity they would’ve never tried this. The only reason they changed their mind is public backlash which would’ve been obvious to foresee.

    So they’re myopic and insensitive. Also just cruel. It doesn’t matter in the slightest if they could’ve gotten away with this. It’s straight evil to try it.

  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    8 months ago

    we’ve decided to waive our right to arbitration

    That’s legalese for “We still think that we have that right, we will use it again”.

    • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      “Just when we have less heat on us and the news doesn’t have everyone so riled up and hating us.”

    • Bojimbo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think they realized that this is the kind of case that could affect arbitration laws if pushed up in appellate courts.

    • Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They could settle out of cout for an amount that they could earn back in under a week. Now they wanna go to court where they’ll end up paying more. Get fucked Disney

  • Krzd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    “unique circumstances” we got caught and too many people heard about it

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I don’t advocate the high seas.

    But man, a TOS like this makes me glad I didn’t watch Andor via Disney+. I certainly don’t feel bad about it now.

    And to the Disney legalbot, I watched it via a friend, of course.

    • Chekhovs_Gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Some of us are old, confused and ignorant when it comes to that sort of (naughty) shenanigans. Is there a “piracy for dummies” somewhere?

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Use a VPN device and use strem.io. Or if you want self hosted copies, get a VPN, download qbittorrent, and then hit up 1337x. If you want a free front end, you can setup Jellyfin on an old PC and direct it to your media.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    A disney SWAT team kicked down my door and scream-asked me at gunpoint if I’d seen the Mandalorian.

    I hear it’s been happening a lot.

  • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Insane that there was no one from Disney side who did not try to stop this in the first place. Don’t mind the empathy, nobody saw this as a bad move for their image? Unless they were being sued for 100+ M I don’t see how this made sense financially for them.

    And this terrible dry response from them, insane.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wonder how these stupid attempts ever get pass these supposedly smart executives. You have to be pretty stupid to hold someone to a agreement that was over four years before. The idea that you are bound by a contract for a online service after you cancel it is absurd and downright stupid.