• mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sad, from a nostalgia point of view, but probably a win, environmentally. We have a pipeline to recycle plastic bottles, the mylar pouches are pretty much all single use.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        …do you not believe bottles are recycled? Or is this just a snarky way of pointing out how ineffective the system is?

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            If you even thought to say that, I can’t blame you for your original comment.

            Yeah, it’s really sad how bad plastic is currently destroying our environment. Humans have to be able to see further into the future than “will I live to see the consequences of my actions? Because if not, I can’t worry about them”

            • Melonpoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I agree,

              It pisses me off that you can slap a recycling logo on a plastic bottle and call it a day when the process is nearly impossible and hardy ever done.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I see a ton of comments here hating on nostalgic people, with no actual nostalgic people in sight yet.

    Personally I don’t care if a pouched drink exists or not, but if they are no longer producing pouched drinks they should probably retire the brand.

    Do you remember what a CapriSun tastes like? It’s somewhere between an extremely-artificially flavored “juice” concentrate and a “fruit flavored” drink like Kool-Aid. The whole appeal was the packaging.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 months ago

    Plastic bottles in general should be illegal. It’s cans, glass bottles, or GTFO when it comes to beverages for me.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ah, but without plastic bottles how would we generate additional profits from the excess waste of oil production?

  • PineRune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    I very specifically remember the controversy 15-20 years ago when it was found that many of these pouches had mold in them, and you couldn’t see it because of the pouch or even taste it. I’m sure the quality control since then has improved, but any time I see a pouch of juice, I think about that mold incident.

    • VonCesaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      When they started doing the childrens semi-solid foods (applesauce) in similar packs, they had the exact same problem for YEARS

      The form factor sucks ass and I wish they’d find a better way for both types of product

  • TwentySeven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    The article doesn’t actually say they are phasing out pouches, just that they are introducing bottles.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yeah thats fair.

      The outrage might even be a result of corporate marketing strategy.

      Maybe I should alakazam the post?

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Fine by me!..As long as whoever at Pepsi made the decision to only release Hard Mt Dew in “Zero sugar” versions is nowhere near it

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That can’t be possible, glucose is required for fermentation to make the ethanol or it couldn’t be alcoholic. It’s the only reason college students could keep on weight where I was from.

        I wonder if it is all some marketing scheme where they are saying zero sugar because there is “no added sugar”. Basically making the non flavored malt alcohol, then flavoring it and adding artificial sweetener to get the sweetness.

        Otherwise if we could ferment and make alcohol without sugars, many people would start drinking 0 calories alcoholic beverages, as drinking 10 beers gives you about 1200 calories (bud light, miller light whatever shitty beers are around 120 calories a piece). Alcoholics would save 2lbs of weight gain a week there.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s probably all marketing, anything branded “Zero sugar” still has that ass tasting sugar substitute aspartame in it

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah thinking back my sentence wasnt right anyways, doesn’t have to be glucose, could use fructose or sucrose, but they all have calories.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have always, for the entirety of their existence, hated those dumb pouches. Good riddance as far as I’m concerned.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Right? But this only applies to Capri Sun. If it were Hi-C, you’d demand a juice box.

    Also, the people who are currently in their childhood absolutely do not care. It’s just us 40+ curmudgeons that must drink Capri Sun from a pouch, Hi-C from a tiny box, and Sunny D straight from that wonky-shaped jug that won’t fit in the fridge door.

  • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t care about the nostalgia, but they are going to stop being easy to squeeze into a lunchbox now, so I’ll find a different brand.

  • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel like I’m the only one who experienced metal bottles of Pacific cooler like 20 years ago. My mom bought them one time before realizing I went through them just as quickly as the pouches, despite them being like 4x the volume and price. They were one of the best things I ever experienced

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    A bottle that’s actually a drink vs. a pouch that’s barely a mouthful? I’m OK with that…

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      A 30 Pack of pouches was sold for like 0.05 to 0.20 USD per fluid oz.

      They sell large 96 fl oz bottles at roughly 0.30 USD per fluid oz, so you’re actually getting less drink with bottles as things stand currently.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah but kids also take much smaller sips than adults. That said, last time I drank a Capri Sun, I downed it in one squeeze and was super disappointed.

      • chingadera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        |I downed it in one squeeze and was disappointed

        This was and always will be all of our experience. Child or not, this was and is the only way