• SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah. Just read an article explaining that you lose the best talent by forcing RTO and turnover jumps 14%.

    • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The real talent already built the good stuff. Now, all they need is someone to follow SOP’s to maintain and carry on. Improvements and new stuff will take the hit, and they will grow stagnant until someone else starts doing something better, and then they scramble and complain as they start losing money and that’s when they start looking for talent again. Except this time, they will just be hired to put in place whatever the other company did and probably be let go after.

      • TipRing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        AT&T hasn’t updated toll free routing control in almost 11 years. Their bvoip portal is similarly antiquated. What good stuff have they been developing?

  • bean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The slow march of the return to office has taken another step forward

    No. 🤬 you ‘Fortune’. You’re just spoon feeding the rich what you think they want to hear.

    Amazon and ATT are big but they don’t represent the whole and does not imply return to office is inevitable.

    • mesa@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Where im at, there is literally only two companies in town. Comcast and ATT. No other options. So yeah, I have a choice but not really. They get my money no matter what. Wish we didnt have a duopoly…

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Back in the 1950s, Amazon and ATT would have been General Motors: an imagined safe, brain-dead corporate sinecure. Nobody entrepreneurial or innovative goes to work at such places. Just technocrats, cogs in the machine. Highly trained functionaries from brand-name universities keeping the juggernaut rolling on. Feeding Moloch.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 months ago

    AT&T owns a lot of corporate real estate. Its fucking with their books so they have to punish everyone so execs look smart.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s more that toxic, sociopathic middle managers can’t torment remote workers as effectively.

  • Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m happy my greedy company closed our office a year ago to save money on the lease. I don’t respect the people in charge but full time WFH is an excellent perk.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      And proper labor laws. This seems like a no brainer for your environmental goals and reduces congestion, and frees up real estate for re development to Appartments.

  • abbadon420@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    My work started demanding the same. I can’t do more than 2 days, because my wife works 3 days and we’ve got to do something with the kids. Two days is what I’ve been doing since I started working there 3 years ago. Luckily they won’t be enforcing it for now. I’m bound to them until summer at least. That’s when I plan on finishing my bachelor that they paid for. I love my job, but this (and the bad pay) is forcing me to start looking for something else ASAP.

  • rjthyen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Can anyone explain to me why companies are pushing RTO? Simply to justify some management positions? Or justify the big buildings they built? To me work from home would have so many advantages for a company and could actually be problematic for some employees. Not only can they save some costs on office space but it opens up their talent pool in a way that could lower wages. They could find someone living in low cost of living middle of nowhere that would do a job for 60k that someone in an expensive city couldn’t justify doing for less than 120k.

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      traditional middle management simply doesnt need to exist of you’re not baby sitting in person. everything else they can do could be AI handled or outsourced. except maybe training up and assessing for promotions. get used to training yourselves and self promotions by job hopping.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        traditional middle management simply doesnt need to exist of you’re not baby sitting in person

        I strongly disagree with that. Properly used, middle managers bring a lot. But I would say that, if a manager requires their staff to be on-site in order to manage them, they’re crap managers who should consider a career transition to frying fast food or gutting fish. They’re typically the ones who judge performance by perceived effort and how well the employee kisses ass, and their main focus is managing upwards by sucking up to their bosses. With remote workers, you need an effective way of assessing results or you’re hosed. I’ve been running remote squads since the 1980s, and for the most part, it’s only a problem if you’re an ineffective manager.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not like China just totally owned you, right? Yeah, let go of your top talent. Good idea.