Summary

Since Trump’s second-term inauguration, five top billionaires have lost a combined $209 billion as markets react to policy uncertainty.

  • Elon Musk’s net worth plunged $148 billion as Tesla shares collapsed amid declining European and Chinese sales.

  • Jeff Bezos lost $29 billion as Amazon stock fell 14%.

  • Sergey Brin’s fortune dropped $22 billion following Alphabet’s weak earnings and regulatory pressure.

  • Mark Zuckerberg and Bernard Arnault each lost $5 billion as Meta and LVMH stocks tumbled.

The S&P 500 is down 6.4%, reversing gains seen post-election.

Non-paywall link

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 days ago

      Stocks will always bounce back. But the people that live off their 401ks now have to sell at a loss to survive.

  • redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    So what? It’s not like their bank accounts got affected. Their shares are valued less which means they did not loose money but the lost money they could have had.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      They lost pretend money that could be used for business loans that they don’t need because they have so much pretend money. The only time it matteds for these parasites is if it happens when they are acquiring another company worth billions of pretend monies.

      Even a stock market collapse is a benefit to these chucklefucks.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        The only time it matters for them is when an Italian plumber shows up to collect their debt.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        they still have billions stashed somewhere and could buy up things on the cheap/.

      • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Matters at least a bit. For instance, Musk has signalled his interest in buying OpenAI. He will find it far harder to get the money for it now that Tesla shares have nosedived.

        More generally with Tesla it is difficult to make a business case for the existence of the company right now, since Musk alienated his entire potential consumer base. I wouldn’t be surprised if the company gets sold into parts in the text two years or so.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          sam ALTMAN doesnt seem interested in selling it to him, musk wants to lead in AI research for some reason, since he has nothing show for it. Thiel is the other competitor with"PALINTIR and anduril"

    • Captain Janeway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 days ago

      They basically use that “money” as collateral for low interest loans. So it impacts how much they can physically buy. It’s a good thing.

  • JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Coverage like this makes me feel sad.

    Do people honestly not realise that billionaires always enrich themselves during recessions?

    This is all going to plan for oligarchs. People celebrating it are naive unfortunately.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      24 days ago

      I would say most of it is meaningless other than Elon and specifically Tesla, Tesla stock prices plumetting will remove most of the power from Elon in the future, even Trump might turn on him once his main thing his net worth evaporates

      • JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        Musk is only a part of the problem, and Musk will have to lose another 110 billion before he even stops being the richest man in the world.

        I’d love to see that happen but I’m not holding my breath. Meanwhile it does nothing but enrich powerful Disaster capitalists including Putin and his coterie.

      • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Id be willing to bet that tesla is no bigger than 10% maximum of his worth. His big ones are space X that just chugs our tax money, and starlink, which I believe is being used as navigation in weapons systems being sold to nations. Tesla is effectively meaningless now.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          I doubt that

          Edit: Tesla’s market cap is now 722 billion, still making it more valuable than any company on this graph. We need to go much lower

          • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            That is absolutely wild… I cant believe how much of the industry they are! Well thats great then! I was worried the death of tesla would be unfelt by elon.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              23 days ago

              He’s hit the level of wealth where he’ll never be poor. But he can be removed from “buy governments” money until such time as he can be held accountable for his actions

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          I think you are wrong in the exact opposite direction, spaced just lost a 25 billion contract too

  • teslasaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Acting like they have the billions as liquid cash is weird.

    IF, and its a big if, they would start selling their assets in order to liquidate their stocks, the assets would nosedive in value to fucking hell. Most of their wealth is smoke and mirrors. Most of them spend money by borrowing cash against their assets.

    Tax them so they have to lend or sell some assets to pay their fair share.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 days ago

      Yes, the more they lose the more we win.

      PERSONAL AUSTERITY!!! SAVE YOUR MONEY AND LET THE RICH GO FUCK THEMSELVES!!!

      • piratekaiser@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        You don’t win by them just losing some money. Redistribution is the name of the game. Even if Tesla hits 0/share, you aren’t getting any more wealth just by virtue of that happening.

        …Aside from basking in the downfall of a nazi of course, but those are priceless things.

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          The win is the diminishment of his economical power. Same goes for Amazon and Meta. Transitioning off of any dependence of those websites and services will empower us and remove these shitheads’ influence.

  • LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    23 days ago

    Good let’s make it another 200 billion EACH and even then that won’t be enough as they’ll all still have hundreds of billions of dollars which is absolutely insane

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Unfortunately our own pensions and such are also getting wiped out by the same forces. And with less access to insider information.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Not really. Comparative wealth of the entire USA is declining, the Billionaires are still on top. If Elon Musk loses 99% of his wealth he would still be a billionaire.

      What this really means is that people around the world outside of the USA no longer view it as a stable investment.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 days ago

    Ridiculous how some people pander, especially the press, to the billionaire set.

    When they have a downturn in net worth people say they “lost” money, or are “poorer” even though they’re still worth billions.

    But when they’re making money hand over fist, millions of dollars daily, people act like that money doesn’t exist. “Oh, it’s tied up in investments, you can’t tax it…It’s not income! It’s not in their bank account.”

    Always the poor billionaires; perpetually simultaneously unable to touch their money, complaining when they lose money they ”don’t have,” and living like billionaires with all the conspicuous consumption that goes with it.