“But I think one of the issues here is that if you’re going to opine on matters of theology, you’ve got to be careful. You’ve got to make sure it’s anchored in the truth, and that’s one of the things that I try to do, and it’s certainly something I would expect from the clergy, whether they’re Catholic or Protestant,” he added.

The pope and Donald Trump have exchanged barbs over the past several days, with the pope denouncing the war in Iran and Trump responding by saying Leo was “WEAK on crime” and “terrible for Foreign Policy.”

  • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If a core Catholic belief is the pope is infallible, especially in the domain of theology & religion, then why is Vance saying any of this? Sure seems like his “Catholicism” is name alone or perhaps his faith is more Protestant than he wants to admit. Or, he has values above his faith, and for a Catholic, that seems worse.

    Whatever, Jan.

    Edit: I’m ex-Catholic. I don’t need a theology lesson about the specifics. What the Pope is expressing here is within the domain of church doctrine.

    Stop trying to defend fascists with pedantic details.

    • Astrealix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not justifying mr couch fucker, but I will point out: modern Catholic doctrine does not actually say the Pope is infallible. Rather, it is that he is infallible when speaking “ex cathedra”, literally “from the chair”, which is also like… weird with different peoples’ opinions on what is ex cathedra. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility

      • Astrealix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        on the other hand, Vance’s “catholicism” doesn’t even match the fucking Bible, so, yknow.

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Well, let’s be real… Catholicism doesn’t match the Bible, either.

          It’s a ridiculous book full of contradictions, so par for the course.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        modern Catholic doctrine does not actually say the Pope is infallible. Rather, it is that he is infallible

        • Astrealix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah, pretty much. What, you expected consistency from the religious sect that has consistently had issues with child sexual abuse?

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I hate to break it to you about other religions, too…

            Obviously the Catholic Church has a systemic problem, and given that it’s one of the largest religions on earth (and their molester shuffling), it’s more universal than in a lot of religions, and I’m not defending them. They’re only unique in scale though.

  • Bakkoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    Think of all the leaders who told the Pope to fuck off in history. Nothing but great successes. Surely we’re winning.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    But I think one of the issues here is that if you’re going to opine on matters of theology, you’ve got to be careful. You’ve got to make sure it’s anchored in the truth

    Oh dear, somebody has a lot of catching up to do. Start with Council of Nicea and go from there.

    FUN FACT: Council of Nicea was formed to settle the age old debate of “should priests cut off their balls or not? On the one hand, Jesus said to do so… on the other hand, my balls.”

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it. ~Matthew 19:12

        Not just priests! He that is able to receive it, let him receive it. Castrati and eunochs only recently fell out of favor in the past century

        Christians are surprisingly ignorant of their own history, it’s kinda funny

        • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Wow, there really is a passage for everything! New Testament too. Sounds like Christians should be getting busy with the pruning shears. Jesus actually recommends this as a cure for horniness. TBF I guess it would be an effective one.

    • AlexLost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The other part was to make it a patriarchal church instead of a matriarchal one. The Virgin Mary used to be the holy figure of Christianity, but men didn’t like that.

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Correction, used to be one of the holy figureS, there were other sects with their own favorites (like John the Baptist and many others).

        They also tossed a lot of “in between” and after testimonies (Gospel of Thomas et al I think) and more.

        BUT, the pressing issue was balls.

        Coincidentally, the word “testimony” is derived from the old custom that referred to swearing an oath on your balls (testicles).

        Lots of balls. balls balls balls

        That obsession survives to this day

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    My take on this is that the Night of the Long Knives has clearly started in Trump’s inner circle and Vance (sent to no-win scenarios in Hungary and Pakistan while Trump and Rubio were bro-bonding without him) is starting to feel on thin ice.

    So he’s trying to demonstrate how far backwards he can bend over to justify anything Trump decides to crap on Truth Social.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Every member of this administration, past, present, and future, need to be held accountable when this is over. If we don’t do that, then the Constitution, our laws, will continue to erode when the next batch of grifters show up to push the envelope to see how far they can bend and break the rules.

  • finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wasn’t aware the Pope was a law enforcement official, or a foreign policy official. Gosh, where would we be without these little gems Trump keeps dropping?