The video shows Michael Yon making false claims regarding so-called “terrorists coming across the border being funded by Jewish money.” Yon was speaking at a “Take Back Our Border” convoy in Texas.

In the video posted on X, formerly Twitter, the man can be heard claiming that HIAS, a global Jewish nonprofit that works to protect refugees, is responsible for funding terrorists coming to America.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    How does a group “descend” to a position they never left. That’s like saying these conservative shitstains “descended” into racism and xenophobia. They are conservatives FFS!

    • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s funny how the starting point was they’re christian nationalist secessionist traitors but OP’s red line is anti-semitism.

      • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s pretty common to see in the Jewish culture. They generally really don’t give a shit about anything outside their bubble but when something happens to them they demand they world drops everything to help them or otherwise you’re a piece of shit.

  • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jesus fuck I’ll never understand these people. So now the Jews are sending Mexicans? Do they hear themselves when they speak? How incredibly fucking stupid that sounds?

      • saruwatarikooji@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except they still believe that one… They even know what color it is.

        It’s blue, apparently, and you can protect your home from it by painting your roof blue… Doesn’t matter what shade of blue, just so long as it is blue.

        True to form… Someone began advertising their blue paint as protection from the laser.

        • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yea, this crap is making it harder and harder to make jokes. It’s like someone installed a mod in the simulation that makes reality go bonkers.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because of their stereotypes. They see Jews as shifty underhanded masterminds. There’s no other minority group that they see that way so everything they don’t like they blame the Jews for.

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is not a new theory. This was the motivation for the 2018 Tree of Life shooting, which is the deadliest anti-semitic attack in American history.

  • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Idk about you guys but I hate Nazis more than I hate illegal immigrants.

    Hopefully their power grid can keep up this winter.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indeed. We need a new version of Godwin’s law. Something like

      The odds of xenophobia, homophobia, transphobia, or antisemitism appearing in a conversation is directly proportional to the number of conservatives participating in that conversation.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Godwin’s law was always more harm than good. Basically stating that despite a long history with fascism, it was inappropriate to compare Republicans to fascists/Nazis. Sure not everyone who votes Republican is a fascist. They’re just okay with fascists. But if you are a fascist or modern Nazi, if you vote you vote Republican and always have.

        What you’re putting forward is much more like a razor anyway. See Occam’s or Hanlon’s.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          …my dude, the only people who are okay with fascists are other fascists. Like, that’s not even a debatable question.

          Godwin didn’t say it wasn’t okay to call Republicans Nazis, he warned that one shouldn’t make such comparisons lightly because it risks desensitizing everyone to the atrocities the Nazis committed and numbs the impact being called a Nazi should have. And to an extent he’s still correct, as much of the Republican party thinks the issue with Nazism is branding (The Boys summed it up perfectly when Stormfront said "People love what I have to say, they just don’t like the word ‘Nazi’ ".)

          He also said it’s perfectly fine comparing Trump to Hitler.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree with you. Though perhaps I was being too subtle. Yes, if you are okay with fascists and fascism then you are one of them. The whole point was that it isn’t better to support it than it is to outright claim to be it.

            As the proverb says, the road to hell is often paved with good intentions. That may have been what Godwin intended. But that wasn’t the result. The result was we were loathe to even discuss the Republican party’s enduring fascism problems In general. Especially in recent times. Because someone would shout out “Godwin’s law!” as a discussion-ending cliche. Simply because Republicans hadn’t slaughtered millions recently.

            We lost all focus on how it starts, over defference with how it ended. Leaving many many people to wonder where the fascism that has existed for most of the last 100 years suddenly came from.

            • Billiam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Look man, I’m gonna need you to stop being so reasonable and polite when debating on the Internet, or I’m gonna have to call your ISP and get your internet privileges revoked.

      • ours@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And it would have gotten away with it if it weren’t for you kids and your dog.

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Technically there is a legal answer but unfortunately in the States it has different possible definitions at the State and Federal level.

      In a very general sense one in part looks at intention and also all the factors around in the environment. If I were to go “we should kill the !” in a forum such as this where generally speaking we are all just people talking and hyperbole is more or less the norm it’s probably not going to meet the criteria of a chargeable incitement. If I as a speaker at a podium where I have been marketed as some kind of authority - even if that is just implied by the fact I am on the podium - start winding up a crowd with the intention of setting them loose to a criminal purpose or start yelling at someone who is already weilding a gun to shoot then that’s a pretty strong case for incitement. Your intention is made fairly clear and you are in a place to directly influence in an outsized fashion how events might play out.

      A lot of the harmful rhetoric that goes on, while priming the stage for individual people to become aggressive and more predisposed to take out their aggressions on the target (stochastic terrorism) has been leaned on quite heavily in modern times it does so basically cheating the system. If you start low and slow and let the water appear to boil itself then it generally protects you from a incitement charge.

  • Erasmus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    In a separate video of the same event posted by Ryan Matta, he also claims that Hamas and Hezbollah “are coming across” the U.S. border. “Venezuela is filled with Hezbollah,” he said. “Our borders are wide open, it’s our government that’s doing it.” Yon reposted the video with the caption “Allahu Akbar!”

    So is it Jews or Hamas/Hezbollah?

    They can’t even keep their shit straight that they are telling people. 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like we need to stop using the term antisemitism and split it into two categories. You have the Nazi’s hate speech vs the Israeli government wants to justify killing Palestinian children.

    You literally have to read the articles to figure out in which way it’s being used.

    And I really wish the Israeli government would stop making me feel I need this distinction.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, we don’t need to split it into two categories because only one of those is antisemitism. If there were an organization of Latino Americans, even a powerful one, who announced that anyone who doesn’t support Mexico’s war against the cartels is racist, no one would say that there are two kinds of anti-Latino racism. There’s racism and then there’s bullshit that a group might claim is racism but isn’t.

      (Sorry, I know that’s not a 1:1 example, but I can’t think of an equivalent one to make my point. I think my point still stands.)

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, I get you. I even agree with you. Unfortunately it’s being used both ways, and I honestly think it would help to differentiate the two, because it’s being diluted by the people that need protection from it the most.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I am one of those people and as a Jew I cannot disagree more. People need to know what is and is not bigotry against Jews. They need to know the difference between calling out Israel for its genocide and blaming an American Jew for that genocide. It is absolutely vital for people to understand that there is nothing antisemitic about criticizing Israel because it is vital for people to understand that American Jews are not Israelis. You have no idea how many people essentially consider us to be foreigners in our own homelands. On my mother’s side, my Jewish ancestors in America go back to the 19th century. Many decades before Israel even existed. I have absolutely no affiliation or association with Israel. I am American. I was born in Indiana. I’m completely steeped in American culture. I know almost no Hebrew or Yiddish. And yet so many people, both pro-Israeli and anti-Israeli assume that because I am a Jew, I must hold allegiance to Israel. And a big reason for that is because Israel wants it that way. What you are suggesting still gives them what they want.

          Edit: Needed to add ‘in America.’

          • linearchaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The number of American Jews I know that are backing Israel in this are not insignificant. There’s a lot of I stand with Israel out there It like to throw around anti-Semitism when people disagree with them.

            The muddying of the term is deliberate and political. And I agree that it is important that people know the difference, which is why I’m against leaving it muddied. If you walk up to a thousand people screaming it’s anti-Semitism and scream back at them that’s not anti-Semitism there’s no movement. You’re telling them that you don’t think what they’re doing is right and they’re telling you you’re a Nazi.

            How do you fix that?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              People used to claim all kinds of things like blackface weren’t racist when they are racist. Meanwhile, there are black writers who claim hip hop is racist., which implies that you’re a racist if you listen to it. Such writers are wrong and ‘but they’re black’ is not a justification. Blackface is racist because it’s white people pretending to be black. Hip hop is not racist because it is part of black culture. And the way you fix that is you keep insisting one thing is bigotry and the other isn’t. Which is why people do not accept blackface today but do accept hip hop.

              • linearchaos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                You have a fairly large group of people here that are making every argument possible to validate genocide. If someone calls me a racist for listening to hip hop there’s nothing really hurt in the balance. The one person in a minority view or even the 000 1% wouldn’t bother me.

                25% of the Jews I know on social media are still flying the I stand with Israel flag. These are not normally sociopaths. If you get into an argument with them they say you just don’t get it they did this and they did that and they do this and they do that. They start quoting scripture, You say yeah but none of that validates genocide, then they change their argument back to what are the white man do to the Indians.

                The term anti-Semitic is being flown as a flag and watered down. I think it would be useful to have a secondary term that means I’m against supporting the genocide of Palestine.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  25% of the Jews I know on social media are still flying the I stand with Israel flag.

                  How many Jews do you know and how many of that 25% claim that any criticism of Israel is antisemitism? Because otherwise, I’m not sure why that’s relevant.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think what they’re saying is, there does NOT need to be a distinction because those claiming it means anything anti-Israel … are wrong. Pure and simple.

          It does not need clarifying from the perspective of people saying antisemitism. It needs clarification in that the morons who insist anti-Israel is antisemitic need to be slapped across the face, because they’re wrong.

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Antisemitism has always been a cornerstone of “White replacement theory.” Why do you think the 2017 Charlottesville neonazis were chanting “Jews will not replace us?”

  • Minotaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was told that 21 year old college students advocating that less children get blown up were the antisemitic ones?

  • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    These people don’t know whether to hate or love Jews depending on what their talking heads told them that morning