• Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    30 days ago

    As a classically trained driver I’ve found automatics make people drive worse because they have to think less. And they already barely think.

    • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      Manual occupies their phone hand. How is someone supposed to heart content so the algorithm gives them more of it!

      Using the PRiNDle opens one up for so many activities.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      Do you sing an aria by Mozart or something when you drive? But anyway, in my experience driving manual makes people more distracted because they have to think about gears and the clutch and stuff. Sure, a competent driver will not have any difficulty with that, but there’s an awful lot of them out there that don’t quite fall into that category.

      • MichaelScotch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        You must not know how to drive a manual. When you know how to drive one, you don’t think about it. You just do it. You feel connected to the car and connected to the act of driving. Automatics absolutely allow people to go on autopilot and they focus on anything but driving: stuffing their face with food, browsing lemmy, texting, talking on their phone on speaker while holding it up to their mouth for some fucking reason even though it would be easier and better sound quality to just hold it up to their ear like phones were designed to be used, or you know, just use the fucking hands free phone calling that’s built into every fucking car that was made in the last decade and a half and included in every cheap ass aftermarket stereo system available on the planet

        • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          I’ve driven manual for over 30 years. Back in the day automatic transmissions were slow, clunky and inefficient. When I first tried modern one, I was instantly converted. Like, I also don’t want to manually adjust rotation speed on my washing machine, why would I do it in the car? Driving electric takes it to a whole new level. It just frees up mind share for concentrating on traffic. There’s no guarantee people will actually do that, of course. And if you think that things that are subconscious don’t take up mind share, you don’t know much about how the brain works. And if you think drivers on manual are less distracted, I have news for you too. I guess you live in the US, where driving manual is a choice. Here it’s mainly in cheaper, older cars which are driven by people who don’t much care about cars or driving.

    • "no" banana@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      I’ve actually observed the opposite. Automatics leave more brain cells to focus on traffic.

      “Self driving” cars on the other hand…

    • Blaster M@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Stupid is as stupid does. A significant portion of trucking accidents involve the truck driver missing a cue because they were mid gear change.

      While it is good to have a person learn to drive stick, it is really hard to get people to learn how to drive if they have zero interest in actually learning how to be a driver, no matter what transmission.

      I personally like dual clutch transmissions and daily’ed a car to 175k miles with one, yet I went out of my way to find a manual version of my current car.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    It’s been difficult to find manual transmisssions for a couple of decades here in the US. That ship has sailed.

    While most of my life I vowed my kids would learn manual, I gave up on that idea because

    • manual transmission cars are rare and disappearing
    • automatics now are more fuel efficient
    • CVT are reliable and even more efficient
    • EVs don’t shift

    My kids started driving in a world of automatics and will soon be in a world with no transmissions

        • lemming741@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          The Prius system is a modern marvel and deserves a better name than eCVT.

          Belt type CVTs are trash. I don’t care that your Subaru has 57,000 trouble free miles, it’s going to die.

      • AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        I’ve had a Subaru CVT for 10+ years with over 200k miles no issues. Anecdotal yes, but I’ve grown fond of the CVT feel, it’s smooth, I like it.

      • meathorse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Belt CVTs - I’m right there with you, but take a look into the more modern geared CVTs such as Toyota e-CVT in their hybrids - I think Honda have a similar tech. It’s a planetary gear system that provides infinite gears without the rubber band feel that plagued belt CVTs and hella-reliable.

        https://youtu.be/vHc-_E8xWnM

        I’m a petrolhead at heart and would love more options for manuals but in lieu of that, a geared CVT is by far the next best transmission and 100x better than a traditional auto.

        Even better, jump in one and take it for a drive - because there are gears, it feels more connected to the motor - almost manual-like response and no sluggish delay like a traditional auto.

        You literally pick your revs by pushing the throttle more or less, they’re magic for hills or when the car is packed since you’re never waiting for revs to climb up into the power nor holding a speed because any faster and you have to change again which takes you out of the power again. If you want more power, you simply modulate that with the throttle and the revs rise instantly to accommodate.

        • lemming741@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          They’re good for go karts and for auto manufacturers that want their product to be worthless about time you pay it off.

    • exasperation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      When I learned how to drive, manual transmissions were higher performance and better fuel efficiency: side by side comparisons of the exact same model of car would show better 0-60 and quarter mile times, while having slightly better EPA fuel efficiency ratings, for the manual transmission.

      At some point, though, the sheer number of gears in an automatic transmission surpassed those in the typical manual gearbox, and the average automatic today has 6 gears, up to 9 in some Mercedes and 10 in certain Ford and GM models. So they could start selecting gear ratios for better fuel efficiency, without “wasting” a valuable gear slot. There was a generation of Corvettes that was notorious for having a 6th gear that was worthless for actual performance but helped the car sneak by with a better highway fuel mileage rating.

      And the automatics became much faster at shifting gears, with even the ultra high performance supercars shifting to paddle shifters where the driver could still control the gear, but with the shifting mechanism automated. Ferrari’s paddle shifter models started outperforming the traditional stick shift models in the early 2000’s, if I remember correctly. As those gear shifting technologies migrated over to regular automatics, the performance gap shrunk and then ended up going the other way.

      At this point there’s not enough reason for a true manual stickshift transmission. It’s no longer faster or more economic, so it’s just a pure fun. Which is fine, but does make it hard to actually design one for any given model of car.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        In the US it’s not really even cheaper - as in maybe you could save a couple hundred on a few models but most won’t offer a choice and it’s nothing in proportion to the cost of the car and the chances of finding one are so small it’s not even worth trying for most cars. There may be a few - are jeeps still available?

        My favorite car was a Miata with a stick (even though I’m too tall to fit) - maybe I need to track down an older one before they’re gone forever

    • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      EVs don’t shift

      I know there’s no reason for them to, but a small part of me wishes there was. Something so satisfying about being good at managing gears

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        So true. I’ve never been more tempted to keep a classic car, even if it’s just an old shit box with manual transmission.

    • nexas_XIII@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      Had a manual 2016 Mazda 3. Took a bit to find it with all the options I wanted but it was available at the time.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        30 days ago

        I bought a civic in 2006 and it took 6 weeks to get one. A manual would have taken much longer

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    US: predominantly automatic transmission, low speed limits

    Germany: predominantly manual transmission, higher speed limits and no limits on around half of autobahns (motorways)

    US road deaths per capita twice of Germany.

    Draw your own conclusions.

    • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      Probably more related to the god-awful infrastructure design in the US, like stroads and an unfathomable tendency to use stop signs for a lot of things they are just not fit for, like to replace speed bumps, chicanes, and roundabouts.

      Also the better comparable statistic should be deaths per distance traveled in cars.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        30 days ago

        Here is the list 6.9 vs 4.2 deaths per 1 billion km. 12.8 vs. 3.35 per 100’000 inhabitants.

        But you need both for a fuller puncture, not everyone involved/dieing is in a vehicle.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        Chicanes are the best part about riding a sport bike! I get to drag knees on public roads!

    • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      30 days ago

      Quick Google

      In 2024 36% of Germans reported using the car daily.

      In 2023 95.3% of Americans older than 16 drive on occasions.

      83 million Germans, 63% above 16

      340 million Americans, 65% above 16

      52 million potential drivers in Germany, 17 million actually drive

      221 million potential drivers in America, 210 million drive daily

      17 million vs 210 million daily drivers

      ~12x more drivers, only 2x more death

      Per capita isn’t really a way to look at it

      Besides automatic cars or lack of a manual transmission is not causing accidents.

      Chance of death goes up significantly with speed

      No one has ever crashed because they couldn’t go over the speed limit

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        Downvoters mad to find out cars are inherently unsafe and need very good infrastructure and to be remotely safe.

        Downvoters mad that Ek= ½mv2, and speed, funnily enough, is dangerous.

        Downvoters mad that manual transmission isn’t making cars safer.

        Car go vroom vroom, but public transport go better

        Fax

  • CptEnder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    29 days ago

    Manuals are infinitely more fun to drive and I like to manipulate the performance characteristics of the car myself but they’re probably going extinct to EV which is fine.

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Not just EVs, modern beltless CVTs and automatic transmissions make manual transmissions practically obsolete. With a wider set of gear ranges and way better performance and reliability they’re better in almost every way than a stick shift. That said, doesn’t matter how good a transmission is if it’s undersized for the engine, so I’m not say the transmission in any particular vehicle is good, just the tech has developed in recent years

      • jdeath@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        those transmissions are only better on paper. sure they could be theoretically better but in practice the transmission programming is to way over aggressively upshift in order to miser out a little more fuel economy on paper (but in practice they waste fuel)

        • InputZero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          True, and as someone who’s been driving the same stick shift for almost 15 years now, you can take it from my cold dead hands. I haven’t seen anything with a beltless cvt, and I haven’t seen an automatic transmission I like more than my five speed, except in traffic. The tech exists, although it’s not available.

  • hOrni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    You guys do realize this is supposed to be a parody of boomer bullshit arguments right?

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    30 days ago

    Lol that handbrake start is utterly useless if you live anywhere that’s actually hilly all over.

    You’ve got to learn the proper clutchwork from the very start or you’ll be taking years on every hill.

    Unless you’re starting from a cold start on a hill without ABS, I guess it could a safety precaution.

    • lunarul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      30 days ago

      that handbrake start is utterly useles

      In my native country that was a requirement for the driving test.

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      Yeah, I’ve heard tons of tricks over the years.

      Just be fast. That’s the trick, practice and you’ll get fast at applying just the right amount of clutch in an instant.

    • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      I live in the Sierra Nevada Mountains and regularly drove my standard transmission in San Francisco (one of the hilliest cities in North America), and used my hand brake all the time to maintain my position while I engaged the transmission. I’m not really sure what you’re on about…

      • CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        As a manual driver living in Seattle and driving a large truck, I can say it’s totally unnecessary if you have the right skills. The handbrake start is a handicap unless you’re Dr ving a vehicle with a worn out clutch.

  • Canopyflyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    28 days ago

    As someone that literally spent 25 years driving a manual, including various stints in racing. Manuals have seen their day.

    It used to be if you wanted better mileage, you drove a manual. If you wanted to be faster on the track, drive a manual (caveat there is drag racing.)

    Today? The computer is just better at controlling a transmission. I drive a Camry Hybrid now and not having shifts is REALLY weird and the drone getting up to highway speeds is annoying, but I do like the 45mpg. Not to mention, when I sat down to learn how the Toyota Hybrid Drive works… It’s a pretty clever system.

    There are a lot of times that nostalgia gets the better of me and I wish I had a car with a manual. My oldest is possibly joining a skating team that is a 2 hour drive away. It’s tempting to let him use my car and then buy an older manual for myself as a toy. I’d love to get a hold of another mid-80’s Corolla GT-S. I autocrossed one back in the late 80’s early 90’s. It still remains my favorite car I’ve ever owned.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    You’re like a solid 20 years behind here bud, they don’t even offer manual transmissions on high end luxury cars. People don’t buy them. I get it, I miss having manual cars, and it’s not as hard as people always complained, I could teach a dog to drive manual over the phone, it’s really not hard.

  • searchingforporpoise@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Bought a new car last fall and looked everywhere for a manual, they are indeed getting rare in the US. Ended up with a Jeep Gladiator sport because it’s a convertible 4x4 with a stick shift and so far the driving experience has been nice. You can tell Stellantis cheaps out on some of the plastic trim stuff and we’ll see just how reliable it is after a few years. Would be sweet if Toyota would make a convertible or T-top 4runner with a stick shift in the US.

  • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Wife owns an automatic, it’s fantastic for when you’re stuck in traffic, but GOD does it make shitty decisions. Of course it cannot anticipate whether or not you’re going to be climbing a slope, so it goes up a gear, but then when it struggles to climb it has to immediately go back down a gear, but you lost all speed already and it’s raining and you can’t pick up traction again so you slide back down the slope and try again. It’s also only really effective for the most tranquil driving, and it has a huuuuuuge inertia when accelerating, like a good half second of not obeying your pedaling, which is 1.frustrating and 2.dangerous in situations where you have to get out of the way urgently. So, would only recommend for old people or people frequently stuck in traffic. The technology has ways to go still

    • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      29 days ago

      I drove one of the first semi trucks with an automatic transmission, and that thing was dangerous. It would pop me out of gear going down hill, thank fuck the brakes held out. The reverse gear could either roll the rig back at 10 inches per hour, or 10mph, and not much in-between.

      Was nice being able to sip a coffee through traffic tho

      • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        That must have been a while ago, I assume trucks got auto transmissions before consumer cars ?

        • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          No, much later. Transmissions in trucks work differently and have to withstand so much more stress. Wasn’t till the early 00’s that anyone got serious about them.

          They’ve been around since the 50’s, but only became widespread in 2010ish. I think Volvo started offering the first production model auto trucks in 06.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    30 days ago

    I used to drive stick in one of the most dense cities and worst traffic on the planet. My left calf muscle is noticeably larger than my right. Manual is enjoyable and freeing, but at this point I prefer an automatic in urban areas with heavy traffic. The volume knob shifter is still weird though.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      I live in a city famous for it’s bad traffic, but prefer driving a manual anyway (when driving a car, at least – actual first place goes to riding my bicycle).

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        Yeah, but when it takes an hour to drive 4 kms, it gets old pretty quick.

          • edric@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            I agree with you, truly. But in my scenario, riding a bicycle in third world traffic that is hostile to cyclists, at 33-35C and 100% humidity, and very polluted air, isn’t really ideal. Having said that, there is public transportation, which isn’t all too great, but at least it exists.