A Cybertruck ‘blew up’ outside Trump’s hotel in Las Vegas

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      From another article

      While some early Tesla models, including the Model S, were prone to spontaneously catch fire if they suffered underbody damage, it’s unlikely the Cybertruck, which has been recalled seven times since it went on sale in November 2023, was released with a similar flaw.

      Nah, no chance a cybertruck would have the same flaw. No chance at all, am I right?

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Well, it’s certainly a different beast. Being a pickup, the chassis is higher off the ground than other teslas. The problem with other teslas was insufficient armor on the underbody, so road debris could puncture through the vehicle and damage batteries. On a pickup there’s both more room for (essentially) an armor plate and any debris would have to punch much higher up.

        All and all, these kinds of battery fires should be much less likely to occur on a truck than on a sedan.

        Edit: Upon actually watching that press conference from the sheriff and fire marshall, it seems clear to me from the language they’re using, that they’re treating this explosion as likely an intentional act. And I have to say, there’s a lot of damning evidence in that truck bed.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The battery pack also has a substantial amount of room between the bottom and the cells. It was so much, that at first people thought that was room for the double stack battery they had originally planned, but it turned out to not be enough space, and is just there to vent gas if cells catch on fire, and more room before a puncture during offroading can reach a cell.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Probably even MORE likely, since these trucks are way less safety regulated than normal cars.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Well, that is funny.

      However the battery didn’t explode, the truck bed was full of gasoline cans and fireworks.

      And the steel body of the truck bed actually did a great job of containing the explosion, focusing it mostly upward. The sheriff points out that the windows in the all glass front of that hotel weren’t even shattered because the blast was so well contained by the truck.

  • BadlyTimedLuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wait, your telling me this was on purpose? I just thought the cyberjunk was so shit, someone visiting the building just HAPPENED to blow up

    • hansolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      There are reports of a firework mortar and gas canister in the back. Looks very intentional and showy from the video. Stupid way to end one’s life, but that was part of it I think as well.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    Says a lot that like nobody knew what to make of it until the propane tanks were found.

    Its still unclear if the driver intended for it to explode or if somebody tossed a bunch of flammables in the back and the truck lit it.

    • hansolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thinking this through, they probably filled the car with gas until they couldn’t breathe and then hit the firework mortar to set it all off. Also gives them a higher chance of ending it all then, as opposed to the “oops, all fire!” version, which would have been a lingering way to go.

  • Wren@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    The irony in the headline alone is enough sustenance to carry me through the lean months ahead.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    That entrance doesn’t even look 2nd rate, it looks more like a 3rd rate hotel.
    I thought Trump liked things to look expensive, but this looks like it’s built with the cheapest of the cheapest standard parts available.