WHAT

  • Former U.S. President Donald J. Trump was shot at a rally in PA.

TRUMPS STATEMENT

“I want to thank The United States Secret Service, and all of Law Enforcement, for their rapid response on the shooting that just took place in Butler, Pennsylvania. Most importantly, I want to extend my condolences to the family of the person at the Rally who was killed, and also to the family of another person that was badly injured. It is incredible that such an act can take place in our Country. Nothing is known at this time about the shooter, who is now dead. I was shot with a bullet that pierced the upper part of my right ear. I knew immediately that something was wrong in that I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin. Much bleeding took place, so I realized then what was happening. GOD BLESS AMERICA!”

WHAT WE THINK WE KNOW SO FAR

  • gunman is dead
  • Trump “is fine”
  • one attendee is dead
  • another attendee is in critical condition

News Sources

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    191
    arrow-down
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Do not advocate or celebrate violence, please. Comments advocating violence will be deleted and bans will be issued.

    Also, please avoid promoting conspiracies. Discussing current events is fine but suggesting things like “it’s a false flag” without evidence is spreading a conspiracy.

      • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s not a justification for more violence, two wrongs don’t make a right. He was wrong for doing what he did and this is wrong as well. This is because political violence in it’s entirety is wrong. Jesus, do people not have principles anymore? Seeing all the supposedly moral people turn into Q anon level conspiracy theorists who condone violence is depressing.

        • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          The death of Hitler, sadam hussein, Bin laden and all the others who threatened the free world disagree.

          • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            But these are vastly different situations. For the record, all three of these individuals used political violence to achieve political aims, that’s one of the reasons why history doesn’t remember them fondly. The constantly killed people they didn’t like under the justification that it’s for the greater good or self defense. Saddam Hussien did that when he genocided the Kurds in Iraq and the invasion Kuwait, Hitler did that with the Holocaust and the invasion of Europe, and Bin Laden did that with 9/11 and the other terrorist attacks he launched.

            Keep in mind, we actually have a justice system in this country that actually works. If we want Trump to face justice it has to go through the justice where he faces trial and is found guilty based on evidence… which has already happened btw for one of his crimes. That’s how justice is handled in a civil democracy. We can’t have randos going on self righteous terrorism crusades killing political candidates they don’t like. If someone tried assassinate Biden, would you being say the same? Probably not, and rightfully so, but the terrorist who tried to kill would be making similar justifications to what you’re trying to make right now. The very idea is wrong.

            • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Donald Trump intentionally and maliciously mishandled an epidemic and allowed it to turn pandemic for his own stupid and shortsighted political gains. He then intentionally hindered national response.

              And then he intentionally incited a literal insurrection. He has absolutely employed political violence.

              • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I’m not here to defend him. He’s one of the worst of the presidents in our history. His list of horrendous acts goes far beyond his pandemic response and the insurrection, and it goes was past his presidency too. He’s truly awful. But with that being said, things like assassinations and terrorism should not become normalized as a legitimate way of achieving political means.

            • in4aPenny@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              Millions of fascists were murdered to win WW2, are you saying we should’ve used strong debate language instead?

        • retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Tell me, should we have turned the other cheek during WWII? Two wrongs don’t make a right after all, right?

          • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            We didn’t join WWII because the Nazis were bad, we joined because Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and then Hitler declared war on the US.

              • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                No, I’m just pointing out that your comparison is flawed. We didn’t know about the Holocaust until the war was almost over. The Soviets were the first to discover and liberate the camps back in 1944 (too bad they ended up having their own brutal camps) and the Americans liberated the first camp they discovered (Ohrdruf) in April 1945… the war in Europe was over in a month. That’s when the then general Eisenhower ordered the American soldiers to find the other camps, free the captives, and take pictures of everything they came across so Nazi crimes can be thoroughly documented and the American public can be made aware of them.

                My point is that we didn’t intervene in the war because of what the Nazis were doing like you seem to imply, we intervened because we got attacked and declared war on.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        50
        ·
        9 months ago

        How many deaths did it result in? Cause there is only one death on Jan 6 that has ever been attributed to Jan 6.

        I don’t disagree that he incited the insurrection, but making false claims doesn’t help show that the left is the party of honesty.

        • retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Why are you pretending like right-wing violence isn’t the literal leading domestic security threat?

          Have you been living under a rock since 2016?

            • retrospectology@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Well, yeah, I mean, we can go back a hundred years, conservatives will always be pushing violence and division whatever era you look at since they can’t hold power without it, I mostly mean it’s come out fully into the open since 2016. The mask dropped off completely and they’re no longer even pretending to be anything but the Confederacy 2.0.

        • ABCDE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The left, who? What party?

          https://www.factcheck.org/2021/11/how-many-died-as-a-result-of-capitol-riot/

          Babbitt plus suicides, and other “natural” deaths.

          On March 7, the District of Columbia’s Police and Firefighters’ Retirement and Relief Board declared that Metropolitan Police Officer Jeffrey Smith’s suicide in the days after the Jan. 6 riot was a line-of-duty death. The board concluded “that Officer Smith sustained a personal injury on January 6, 2021, while performing his duties and that his injury was the sole and direct cause of his death.

        • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hey numbnuts, America doesn’t have a left and it’s the MAGA fascists that are the problem here

    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      I know you have to say this, but holy shit do I disagree.

      This person advocated significant violence and contributed to the deaths and loss of human rights of thousands. A good whack of the world would turn up hungover to work tomorrow after celebrating only a few inches over.

        • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’m still here I see. Here’s the precious source since I’m full of shit.

          https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/04/leader-of-the-pro-trump-project-2025-suggests-there-will-be-a-new-american-revolution-00166583

          NEW YORK — The leader of a conservative think tank orchestrating plans for a massive overhaul of the federal government in the event of a Republican presidential win said that the country is in the midst of a “second American Revolution” that will be bloodless “if the left allows it to be.”

          Why, exactly, should we simply lie over and do nothing? How is calling for violence over this bad?

          • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            He said Monday’s decision — which gives presidents broad immunity from prosecution — is “vital” to ensure a president won’t have to “second guess, triple guess every decision they’re making in their official capacity.”

            😬😬😬

            Yeah, last thing I want is for the president to have to think through their decisions.

        • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Original comment was removed for violating Lemmy’s content policy, and subsequent comment was removed for reposting the original.

            • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              The post in question was removed for advocating violence. The mod log is public, including the original content, so it is not necessary to repost a removed comment for transparency.

    • Christer Enfors@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      spreading a conspiracy

      I know this is off-topic, but can we please go back to saying “conspiracy theory”? Conspiracy and conspiracy theories are not the same. There are actual conspiracies (a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful) , and there are theories of conspiracies. They should not be confused.

      • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Surprised you’re not already banned just for the c-word. I mean, if someone crashes their car through a storefront, I could speculate without evidence that the driver was excessively old, young, drunk, or just plain stupid and it’s left up to the reader to take my comment with a grain of salt, but if I so much as entertain the possibility of this shooting being anything besides what is being reported by official channels, I must be silenced.

      • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        If the only way you can discuss an assassination is by advocating for additional violence and pushing lies, then I guess not?

        • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          You are limiting discussion to centrist viewpoints, centrism caters towards permissive attitudes towards fascism. You know this.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          pushing lies

          How did you determine what was true in this situation and what was false? I am curious about your methodology.

          • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            True: confirmed information. False: unconfirmed information of a speculative nature. Do you see a specific issue you disagree with or are you just trying to argue?

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              You are just moving the problem around via definitions not actually saying what method you used to know exactly what happened yesterday.

              All I asked is how you arrived at the truth. Did you see evidence that the general public didn’t? Because what I am seeing is you all are so absolutely certain you have literally compared it to Covid misinformation. Amazing, a 30 hour news event is so well understood you can compare our knowledge of it to the single most studied virus in human history months after a new variant had appeared.

              It is not unreasonable how you were able to obtain information the rest of us apparently do not have and how you were able to eliminate all other alternatives so quickly.

          • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Not really what I said at all. “Hey guys, don’t make stuff up, please rely on credible sources, and don’t advocate for violence”.

            Or, in other words: follow the rules we’ve always had in place

            • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              9 months ago

              Advocating for, or not advocating for, violence is a political stance. Many people defend Israel’s ongoing genocide and are not blocked from doing so. That doesn’t feel like the rules being consistently enforced. The people speculating on whether or not this is staged have access to the same information as everyone else, and in the spirit of true discourse, if it was seen to be false you could figure that out by discussion rather than censorship.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Alright, let’s get it out ahead of time, since I’m already seeing this:

    It’s probably not staged. Trump reacts quickly - the fuck kind of timing you think that bloated potato has? To lift his hand to his ear just as the gunshot rings out? And the idea that the shooter grazed him on purpose is, likewise, absurd. The kind of risk that would entail, to just nick his ear?

    Whether the shooter was insane or politically motivated, this is a real event.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I said this in another one of these threads- it is not at all outlandish to think that someone unhinged with a gun would see the threat of a fascist dictator and decide to do something about it.

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I don’t doubt the shooter was genuinely trying to kill him. But I also think there are an unprecedented number of Republicans and Democrats who would be secretly relieved if their own party’s candidate were assassinated.

    • kescusay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      Thank you. And fuck the idiots spouting off with the “staged” nonsense. The time to believe something is staged is when you have evidence that it was.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        People are obviously on high alert, considering how far Trump is willing to go given Jan 6th. From the Reichstag fire to the Russian apartment bombings, such events manufactured or actual have profound impact on public perception and action. Naomi Klein’s (not to be confused with the nut job Naomi Wolf) The Shock Doctrine details this well.

        No sign this was a false flag, but holy fuck does it have terrible implications.

      • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Trump’s entire persona is built on lies, it shouldn’t be a surprise that it’s many people’s first thought.

        • kescusay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          But it shouldn’t be. He shows no signs - cognitively speaking - of being capable of putting something like this together as a stage-managed event, and all of his past stage-managed events have been shitshows because he micromanages everything and he’s incompetent.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, a 120 meter shot to graze does not exist. One inch to the right and he’s dead. With wind variables and stuff, the shooter who can reliably pull that off in one shot or volley does not exist.

      • nepenthes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Everyone keeps saying it can’t be staged because it was so close.

        I just wanted to point out it can be both staged and a successful assassination if the end goal is to point the finger at the left and martyr a polarizing figure.

      • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        With a better rifle and a spotter maybe.

        Edit. Just want to say I don’t think it’s a false flag in anyway. Just speculating lol

        • Paddzr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not how guns work I’m afraid. I wouldn’t trust Olympic shooter with that type of shot at a closer distance.

          It is not marvel movie, you don’t go for the head.

    • Nobody@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, if you’re going to stage a fake assassination, you don’t fire a bullet a couple inches away from a kill shot. It’s crazy how close this was to a successful attempt.

    • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      If it was staged then they are playing a very risky game. It doesn’t take much error to make a bullet that grazes your ear dome you. It’s basically certain that this wasn’t staged.

  • Soltros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    What peeves me is that the right are all clutching their pearls about anyone who says anything other than blind Trump sympathy. Don’t get me wrong, political violence is wrong. But, remember this:

    When Paul Pelosi got his face bashed in with a hammer, the right made fun of it. Mocked him. Idk, man.

    • kescusay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      That shit was amazingly disgusting. And yeah, Trump gets no sympathy from me. But I won’t call for his death, either. I want him to live a very long time. In prison.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        There are people on the right, that would call you out on even that. They’re gaslighting anyone left of Mussolini on what are the rules they should be following.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Have we considered that the gunman might be a jilted lover? /s

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    The great recession, a global pandemic, and now a second American civil war. I want off this train.

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Guy tries to overthrow the country, and people are worried that someone tried to kill him. What is wrong with this world. If people aren’t trying to kill him we have something to worried about.

    The justice system failed to arrest and detain the suspect and keep him imprisoned until charged properly. This isn’t a failure of the people, it is a failure of the government.

    • kescusay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      9 months ago

      Wouldn’t be the first time. Conservatives are conservative up until the moment someone uses freedom from government oversight in a way that hurts or inconveniences them. Then they’re all, “There oughta be a law against blah blah blah” without an iota of self-awareness.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        9 months ago

        I like it when they say it’s not about guns, it’s about mental health and then you say okay, let’s have universal healthcare and they say, “no, not like that!”

        • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Right? I’m 100% ready to agree with them on the mental health aspect, let’s address that by giving people healthcare and access to food and housing

          But that’s not cruel enough for them

    • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      Man, I would love to watch his supporters work through the dissonance on that one. On one hand, they already chose Trump over their god… On the other hand, “come and take it” culture is right up there with evangelicalism as far as being really ingrained.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          “Trump only wants to take the guns from those people, not us!”

          Conveniently ignoring the circle of who qualifies as those people is ever expanding…

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I love when people downvote your comments as if half the shit you say on here isn’t facetious.

          Guys, I’m pretty sure they don’t actually think Biden is going to take your guns

  • surfrock66@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 months ago

    I mean this is the world he wants, you can’t dog whistle people to take up arms against tyranny without a comfortable acceptance of the irony pool you are filling. Everyone will try to spin this to their political advantage but the truth is this is the level of political discourse the right has been driving towards.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Trump’s rhetoric almost lead to Pelosi getting killed. Trump’s rhetoric got people killed on Jan 6th. Republicans have been posting images with crosshairs of their opponents for years, and now they are surprised that shit is turning violent…

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I bet Trump is perversely happy he got shot. He can be a Real Brave Man, now. How much attention it gets him. How much more clout he believes he will get because he will weasel some political capital out of it. Heaven help us if the shooter was liberal, this man is fine with dog whistling violence and more than a few of his followers are itching to engage in it. It won’t matter one whit how many people have been killed or hurt by right wingers.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      They even managed to get a triumphant picture out of it. The Secret Service is surrounding him, he’s bloody but holding his fist high, and the American flag is perfectly framed in the background. This shit is going to pump his polling numbers. All he has to do is put whatever fake nationalist bullshit he wants over that picture for 30 seconds and it’s an instant ad in battleground states.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I didn’t need this fucking stress on top of everything else. I only hope that the poll bump he’ll get for this is short-lived.

    • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      71
      ·
      9 months ago

      He is going to win. We’ve already been over this. Maybe now you can start the process of coming to terms with what that actually means.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I can appreciate where [email protected] is coming from.

          I personally feel that 2008 was the tipping point for a lot of people and we’ve been reeling from it ever since.

          While things may have been bad before, it really does feel like the intensity has increased dramatically ever since Trump was first elected. These people have become emboldened, and no longer keeping themselves in check. Any sense of decorum and decency are things of the past.

          You are welcome to dismiss me as nothing more than an over dramatic doomer, but I have a feeling I’m not the only one who feels this way. It’s not about being right or wrong. It’s about being overwhelmed and mentally drained about being able to do anything positive about it.

          Anecdotally, I would guess this is part of their motivation for the attempted assassination. They were likely so overwhelmed that they felt the only solution was to try to kill Trump.

          And if that’s even remotely true, that’s a fault of society as a whole as much as it is the shooter’s fault.

          One way or the other, we are at a pivotal moment in American history; and I’m not just being dramatic. There is a lot on the line for both sides no matter who wins in November.

        • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          9 months ago

          My analysis isn’t based on extra-sensory perception. I am able to look at the facts as they are presented from a rational, unemotional perspective. It is how I knew Hillary was going to lose in 2016, and it is how I know Biden is going to lose in 2024.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            There are no facts presented to you now that can tell you definitively what will happen in November.

            You being correct one time does not make you correct this time.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                9 months ago

                No we won’t, because all you are doing is calling heads or tails. You have a 1:2 chance of being right regardless of why you are making your prediction.

                • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Look honestly at the historical context and externalities of the moment you are in, and tell me you think it is a coin toss.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Your cognitive dissonance is strong,

            … do you even know what that term means?

            • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yes, I do. Which is precisely how I know you are engaged in that behavior now. It is a very hard thing to accept that you are living in a country that is going to usher in fascism with thunderous applause. But regardless of how you feel about it, that is what is happening before your very eyes. It is important to be objective about that so you are able to evaluate what you can do to fight back once that becomes necessary.

              • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                . It is a very hard thing to accept that you are living in a country that is going to usher in fascism with thunderous applause.

                Okay, so you don’t actually know, you just think it means ‘not accepting (what you see as) reality’. Thanks for confirming.

                Cognitive dissonance is described as the mental disturbance people feel when their beliefs and actions are inconsistent and contradictory

                • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Here, I’ll give you an example you can perhaps identify with. You spent multiple comments strawmaning my arguments, putting words in my mouth, and gaslighting me for saying Biden had absolutely no chance of victory two days ago.

                  You then attempted to suggest that I did not care about political violence, and that I was uneducated about important modern historical events in an attempt to delegitimize my points about removing Biden as the nominee.

                  This is you today:

            • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              The comment in question contained a personal insult against another user and was removed for incivility. The mod log is public.

              Please don’t repost removed comments. You can link to the comment or mod log if you have questions about a particular moderation action. All decisions may be appealed by DMing a mod for additional review.

                • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I am not sure that you can link to an individual comment, but you can link to the community mod log or the user mod log depending on the circumstance. Or you can link to the individual comment in the thread, even if it has been removed.

                  It is preferred to reach out to a moderator(s) by direct message, in which case you could include a screen image of the mod log along with your question.

                  I understand why one may have an interest in asking questions publicly, although it makes is very difficult for mods to respond (unless you tag us). If you are interesting in getting a response, this is perhaps the least efficient way. We are assured to see report, and likely to see a DM in a much more reasonable time.

              • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Also, I am not really seeing a personal insult? Criticism of personal dissonance, yeah, but is that an insult?

            • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I believe the mods were attempting to stop PugJesus and I from engaging in a slap fight, but you see how well that worked out.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        This event just shows that anything can happen at any moment. Nothing is a sure thing. Not a Trump win, not a Biden win, and not a win for any other candidate who may run.

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I mean, the right is already committing violence against its enemies, the media just fails to report it as what it is. Instead it’s “lone wolves” and “mental health problems”. Rittenhouse literally shot people on camera and got away with it “because skateboard”.

    • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I doubt it. Something like this already happened before in 2017. A deranged Bernie supporter went to a congressional baseball game and tried to shoot as many Republicans as he could. He ended up killing 6 people. However, despite that, there were no reactionary shootings. It was an isolated incident. I think this will be the same, or at least I hope.

        • tamal3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          With the number of shootings that happen in the US… Pointing out a seemingly unrelated incident that occurred months later is ridiculous cherry picking.

        • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          We literally have no idea what Stephen Paddock’s motivation was. The Las Vegas shooting was not a reaction to the congressional shooting

          • retrospectology@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            Read your first sentence, then read your second sentence. Then do it again a few more times, and then ask yourself why I would listen to anything you say?

            • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              There’s nothing wrong with what I said. You can’t give criminals motives nor can you give different crimes connections based on your personal opinions. The matter of fact here is that despite numerous investigations, we still don’t know why the Las Vegas shooter did what he did. If evidences surfaces that he was indeed motivated and inspired by the congressional shooting that happened shortly prior then we can establish such a connection, but until that happens we can’t.

            • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I disagree, I think their names should be known and their crimes studied. We can’t erase what they did, nor should we. We have to discuss and research these fucked up individuals otherwise how are we going to come up with a solution for the root cause of the issue?

              • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Study them, yes. But that doesn’t require making their names and faces commonplace. Most research is done without broadcasting people’s names and faces to the world. Heck - when I was doing analysis for HHS I wasn’t given anybody’s name or picture at all.

                Some of these killers are seeking fame and attention, and by giving it to them we encourage others.

  • errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 months ago

    Reddit’s megathread on this is already broken. Just goes to show how terrible it is, you’d think after all this time they’d figure out how to run a website…

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      My guess: Spez team broke it when the monetizattion algo collided with the censorship algo.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m so over politics in America. This shit is terrifying. People trying to overthrow elections, seniors that are too old to lead, voter suppression, people stuck in disinformation bubbles, and now assassins. Meanwhile, the rich just get richer, and “middle class” life just gets harder and harder.

    I have dual citizenship with an EU nation from birth, and this week had made me start to dust off those childhood documents and look into the details of relocating.

      • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Doesn’t matter, we’re not a bunch of tribalistic, bickering children

        Anywhere is fine

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Every time I’ve read someone shitting on America, and then they mention something like not being American, if you ask where, the question is always avoided.

        • hperrin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I have no intention of giving up the fight and fleeing. If progressives who can leave do, those who can’t are doomed to a Republican hellscape.